Grandfather’s ‘Koli’ entry can’t sink teen’s Scheduled Tribe claim: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court ordered a Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe certificate for a 17-year-old, rejecting reasons cited by the scrutiny panel to deny his claim, including his grandfather's school records.

scheduled tribe bombay high court koli mahadevThe student from Solapur sought a Scheduled Tribe validity certificate as a member of the “Koli Mahadev” tribe for his admission under the ST category. (AI-generated image)

The Bombay High Court has directed the Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee to issue a “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe validity certificate to a 17-year-old Solapur student within a week, holding that the committee had rejected supporting school records on unacceptable grounds and wrongly relied on a “Koli” entry in the student’s grandfather’s record.

Justices Sharmila U Deshmukh and Neeraj P Dhote observed that the Vigilance Cell report showed the student’s family traditionally collected honey and forest produce.

“The Scrutiny Committee has discarded the entry in the school record of the Petitioner’s cousin-grandfather (grandfather’s brother), which supports the Petitioner’s tribe claim, for unacceptable reasons. Under the facts and circumstances, the impugned order is liable to be quashed and set aside,” the August 20 order said.

The court said that the situation would have been different if the grandfather’s “Koli” entry had been made before the Constitution came into force. It also noted that the Scrutiny Committee had found that the grandfather’s brother’s school records said he was a “Koli Mahadev” and that school record was not found to be tampered with. The Koli Mahadev tribe holds constitutional status as a Scheduled Tribe.

Student seeks Koli Mahadev certificate

The 17-year-old student in question from Solapur sought a Scheduled Tribe (ST) validity certificate as a member of the “Koli Mahadev” tribe for his admission under the ST category. The scrutiny committee, however, rejected his claim on August 13, relying on a 1951 school record of his grandfather that mentioned his caste as “Koli”. It also rejected a 1958 school record of the grandfather’s brother, which mentioned “Mahadev Koli”, after finding the document to be not trustworthy.

Justices Sharmila U Deshmukh and Neeraj P Dhote Bombay High Court scheduled tribe Justices Sharmila U Deshmukh and Neeraj P Dhote held that the scrutiny committee’s reasons for rejection were unacceptable.

The student argued that the committee did not consider the documentary evidence in its right perspective and invalidated his tribal claim only based on one entry of “Koli” in his grandfather’s school record.

The student’s counsel submitted that the impugned order must be set aside, based on the documents on record, and he was entitled to the ST validity certificate for the “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe.

Story continues below this ad

Advocate Tejas J Kapre, appearing for the state, submitted that the grandfather’s brother had taken admission in Class 1 at the age of 10, when the minimum age for admission was six years.

The counsel argued that the scrutiny committee had rightly considered the evidence on record and no fault can be found with the disputed order, and sought dismissal of the petition.

Committee’s reasons unacceptable: HC

The court observed that the Vigilance Cell report indicated that the “Koli Mahadev” tribe earlier resided in hilly regions. The other reason for invalidation of the student’s ST claim is that he failed to establish affinity towards the “Koli Mahadev” tribe.

“…the Vigilance Cell report goes to show that, the collection of honey and forest product was the traditional occupation of the petitioner’s family. The Vigilance Cell report does not indicate that, fishing was their traditional occupation,” it added.

Story continues below this ad

The court held that the reasons submitted by the scrutiny committee were unacceptable, and directed the committee to issue a validity certificate in favour of the student as belonging to the “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe within a week.

Somya Panwar is a legal journalist at The Indian Express (Digital), where she covers the various High Courts across the country and the Supreme Court of India. Her writing is driven by a deep interest in how law influences society, particularly in areas of gender, feminism, and women’s rights. She is especially drawn to stories that examine questions of equality, autonomy, and social justice through the lens of the courts. Her work aims to make complex legal developments accessible, contextual, and relevant to everyday readers, with a focus on explaining what court decisions mean beyond legal jargon and how they shape public life. Alongside reporting, she manages the social media presence for Indian Express Legal, where she designs and curates posts using her understanding of digital trends, audience behaviour, and visual communication. Combining legal insight with strategic content design, she works on building engagement and expanding the desk’s digital reach. Somya holds a B.A. LL.B and a Master’s degree in Journalism. Before moving fully into media, she gained experience in litigation and briefly worked in corporate, giving her reporting a strong foundation. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments