2 Ghaziabad hospitals to pay Rs 12 lakh to family of 4-year-old rape-murder victim

The 4-year-old rape-murder victim’s family had alleged in the Supreme Court that she could have been saved had she been provided timely medical care.

Ghaziabad hospital rape murder case Supreme CourtThe Ghaziabad private hospitals volunteered to pay compensation after the Supreme Court bench monitoring the case said it would otherwise have to direct them to do so. (Image generated using AI)

Two Ghaziabad private hospitals accused of being negligent in providing timely treatment to a four-year-old girl, who was raped and subsequently died, volunteered to pay Rs 12 lakh compensation to her family on Friday. While one of the hospitals, a multi-speciality institution, would pay Rs 10 lakh, the other, with an Ayurveda practitioner, would pay Rs 2 lakh.

The institutions volunteered to pay after a three-judge bench presided over by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, which is monitoring the case, said it would otherwise have to direct them to do so.

With the girl’s family alleging that she could have been saved had she been provided timely medical care, the court said it will issue some guidelines to ensure immediate assistance in such circumstances.

Story continues below this ad

“We are further inclined to issue some guidelines to ensure timely medical care and proper handling of such cases,” the bench also comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana said.

The court has been monitoring the case after the victim’s father, a daily wager, sought a court-monitored probe by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) or the Central Bureau of Investigation.

On April 24, the Supreme Court directed the setting up of an SIT after the father accused local police of insensitivity. He also alleged that though the child was rushed to the two hospitals, they did not provide emergency medical care and that she could have been saved with timely intervention.

Clear case of negligence: Girl’s father

On Friday, Senior Advocate N Hariharan, appearing for the girl’s father, said the SIT report gave a “damning” picture of the conduct of the hospitals. “It is a clear case of negligence on the part of the hospitals. The first hospital had the facility of calling doctors, but they neither called them nor informed anyone and simply decided to pass on the patient to the next hospital. The next hospital was a multispecialty hospital with innumerable departments. They could have treated the child. The child would have been alive,” Hariharan argued.

Story continues below this ad

On police negligence, he said the First Information Report, registered after a delay of 30 hours, only invoked the offence of murder and not rape.

The senior counsel said that though the Supreme Court had intervened in this matter, there are hundreds of similar cases where nothing happens. The bench said it will issue some guidelines in this regard and asked Hariharan to give suggestions.

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments