Food bought to break Ramzan fast leaves family ill, hypermarket to pay Rs 60,000

The commission found that there was no evidence from the opposite party to prove that the food items delivered to the complainant were hygienic and edible.

Ramzan fasting caseThe complainant alleged that she and her family fell ill after consuming the food product. (Image generated using AI)

A consumer commission in Kerala recently directed a hypermarket to pay Rs 60,000 to a woman whose family allegedly suffered abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhoea after consuming food purchased from the store to break their Ramzan fast.

President Mohandasan K and members Preethi Sivaraman C and Mohamed Ismayil C V of the Malappuram District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the hypermarket liable for deficiency in service for selling contaminated food items.

“The Commission finds that the opposite party had sold contaminated food items and thereby committed deficiency in service towards the complainant hence the opposite party is liable for their deficient service,” the order read.

Complaint, threat

According to the complaint, the complainant and her family members had purchased food items, including beef liver pepper, beef roast, and chicken 65 from the hypermarket to break their Ramzan fast. It was alleged that after 30 minutes of consuming the food, the complainant’s daughter developed abdominal pain, nausea and loose motion. Other members of the family also developed similar symptoms.

It was stated that the complainant’s daughter complained to the food and safety officer. The complainant alleged that, as a result, the hypermarket and one of its employees retaliated against them on social media and threatened them. Later, the complainant moved the consumer commission seeking compensation.

The hypermarket denied the allegations and argued that it had supplied good quality food. Its counsel argued that the medical prescriptions had been fraudulently procured to tarnish the establishment’s reputation.

The commission found that there was no evidence from the opposite party (hypermarket) to prove that the food items delivered to the complainant were hygienic and edible. It also relied on documents obtained from the food safety office showing that authorities had inspected the establishment on several occasions and detected unsafe food items.

Story continues below this ad

The commission further noted that proceedings before the sub-divisional magistrate showed that the hypermarket had earlier been fined Rs 5 lakh by the authorities for the sale of unsafe food. It held that the sale of contaminated food by the hypermarket and later mischievous act on its part caused mental agony, inconvenience and hardship to the entire family of the complainant.

“The commission finds that the opposite party has committed deficiency in service towards the complainant, as result the complainant, her husband and two minor children had suffered physical discomfort,” the commission said. It, therefore, directed the opposite party to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation and Rs 10,000 as litigation costs to the complainant.

Takeaway

The case highlights that sellers must ensure that the food products they sell are safe and fit for consumption. It also underscores that consumers who suffer harm from contaminated food can seek compensation for the resulting physical discomfort, mental agony and hardship.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals can contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express (Digital), where he specialises in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish covers court developments and key cases for the audience. Expertise Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of courts into clear, legal content. He also runs liveblogs from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments