Court: It will be on Friday 2:30, both the matters.
Hearing concludes for the day
Earlier, Kejriwal had written a letter to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, saying that he will not participate in the proceedings pending before the judge. (File photo)Excise Policy Case News Updates: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday said that it will appoint three seniors (advocates) as amicus curiae to represent AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak in the CBI’s plea against the discharge order passed in their favour in the excise policy case. Earlier, Kejriwal, Sisodia and Pathak had written to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, saying that they will not participate in the proceedings pending before the judge. The court has posted the matter to Friday for further hearing.
“What I will do is I will appoint a senior amicus. It will be appropriate that I hear CBI argument once I appoint amicus,” the court said today.
Boycott: Kejriwal had written a letter to Justice Sharma, saying that he will not participate in the proceedings pending before the judge. “I have lost hope of getting justice from Justice Swarana Kanta. Therefore, I have decided to follow the path of Satyagraha as shown by Mahatma Gandhi,” he said. After Kejriwal, AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak also wrote to Justice Sharma informing that they too will go unrepresented before her court. Justice Sharma had earlier refused to recuse herself from hearing CBI’s plea.
Recusal plea: While rejecting the recusal plea, Justice Sharma said, “If I were to accept these (recusal) applications, it would set a troubling precedent”. She also said that every unproven and unfounded accusation of bias or partiality is not merely put on an individual judge but also casts aspersions on the collective integrity of the institution of the judiciary itself. The judge said that the court will stand up for itself and for the institution when such standing is required, though it may appear difficult.
Court: It will be on Friday 2:30, both the matters.
Hearing concludes for the day
Court: He is not present and his counsel is also not present
Court: Right to file reply closed for R16
Court: Please tell me who has not filed the reply
Counsel: R8, 18 and 19 of course have not filed, they are not represented so they have not filed. 13 and 14 have not filed. 15 and 16 also not filed.
Court: I will appoint three seniors in this case
Court: We will hear on Friday. I will pass an order on amicus and then we will start hearing
Court: Three are not appearing. What I will do is I will appoint a senior amicus. It will be appropriate that I hear CBI argument once I appoint amicus.
Court: Who is not present in the case?
Court is informed Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak are not appearing.
Advocate Farrukh Khan appears for Sarvesh Mishra
Advocate Khan: I appear for Sarvesh Mishra.
SG Mehta: He has nothing to do in this matter.
Advocate: Let me make submissions in this application because I am aggrieved by the order.
Court: Let me hear the main matter
Court: We can list these together
Court: Item 96 (ED's petition for expunging of remarks)
SG Mehta: Arising from the same impugned order.
Justice Sharma presides
ASG SV Raju for ED is also appearing through VC
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for CBI is appearing through VC
The court will hear CBI's arguments today
On the last date of hearing, the court granted last opportunity to the respondents to file reply to the CBI's plea.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma will hear the CBI's revision plea against the discharge order at 2:30 pm. It will also hear ED's plea seeking the expunging of adverse remarks made by the special judge against the agency.