Vimal Elaichi ad row: Delhi High Court reserves order on notices to Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn

The court has reserved its order on a plea by Vimal Elaichi’s master licensee challenging Maharashtra FDA notices to the three actors, who were accused of surrogate advertising for pan masala.

Delhi HC: Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff was sent a show-cause notice by FDA, Maharashtra (Screenshot: YouTube/VimalElaichi)Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff was sent a show-cause notice by FDA, Maharashtra (Screenshot: YouTube/VimalElaichi)

The Delhi High Court Monday reserved its order on a plea challenging the showcause notice to Vimal Elaichi’s brand ambassadors — actors Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff — alleging they did ‘surrogate advertising’ for pan masala.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma reserved the order on a plea by PB Agro LLP, which is the master licensee for manufacture and sale of Elaichi and Pan Masala not containing tobacco under the Vimal brand.

The case

On August 11, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in Maharashtra had issued a show-cause notice to the Bollywood actors, alleging that their advertisement for Vimal Elaichi amounts to surrogate advertising for Vimal pan masala — a product prohibited in the state.

The LLP company challenged the showcause notice on the ground that being prohibited from promoting its product — by taking coercive action against the brand ambassadors — causes irreparable harm to the company and infringes on its fundamental rights to conduct business.

According to the company, the brand ambassadors are engaged “to promote only the cardamom product” under the Vimal brand “and no other product”.

“Apart from cardamom, the only other product manufactured, but never promoted directly or even indirectly, under the brand VIMAL by the petitioner is pan masala not containing chewing tobacco,” the company said in its petition.

The Centre’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare was also made a party in the case.

Story continues below this ad

Its counsel Rukhmini Bobde on Monday opposed the plea on the ground of jurisdiction, submitting that the appropriate jurisdiction would lie in Maharashtra given that the FDA’s action has stemmed from there, and not Delhi.

The company has argued that the food and drug administrators operate under the ministry’s jurisdiction, which in turn is based in Delhi.

‘No pan masala promotion’

The company has further pointed out that the showcause notice was sent “only to the brand ambassadors despite the fact that the petitioner alone is going to suffer irreparably due to any action taken” by the FDA.

The company has also denied allegations of promotion of pan masala in Maharashtra, emphasising that it is compliant with the law which prohibits manufacture, storage, transportation, distribution and sale of pan masala in the state. It also said it is compliant with the Supreme Court’s directive which has banned pan masala containing chewing tobacco since 2013.

Story continues below this ad

It has also denied allegations of surrogate advertisement. In its plea, the firm said that it is “not even remotely trying to associate the mind of the consumer to any product apart from Elaichi in the ad campaign… Much less, to a product which is forbidden to be even transported and sold in Maharashtra.”

What the Maharashtra FDA said

The FDA, in its August 11 notice, had flagged an ad of Vimal Elaichi on YouTube, adding that it “prima facie appears that the advertisement promotes the VIMAL brand, which is mainly associated with pan masala…”

The showcause notice had called on the three actors and brand ambassadors of Vimal Elaichi to “immediately discontinue” their participation in the ads; to “immediately remove the said advertisement and promotional content” from the actors’ official social media handles, websites and other digital platforms under their control or cease its promotion and dissemination; and to not provide any further cooperation or assistance in the broadcasting, publication, dissemination or promotion of the said advertisement in any form.

While issuing a final warning, the FDA had also sought a written explanation from the actors as to why legal action should not be initiated against them.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments