Premium

Hearing pleas by Lalu and Robert Vadra, Delhi HC Justice Manoj Jain will now take up Kejriwal’s ‘liquor scam’ case

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, whom AAP leaders had accused of bias, has withdrawn from the case and opened contempt proceedings against the accused.

Delhi HCJustice Swarana Kanta Sharma (left) and Justice Manoj Jain.(Special arrangement photos)

Matters relating to the Delhi excise policy case that were being heard in the High Court by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma have now been listed before Justice Manoj Jain, and are expected to be taken up on Tuesday (May 19).

Justice Sharma said last week that she would no longer hear the alleged ‘liquor scam’ matter, and initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against seven AAP leaders for publishing “contemptuous material” against her and the judicial institution on social media.

In her 68-page order passed on May 14, Justice Sharma named AAP national convener and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia, former AAP MLAs Durgesh Pathak and Vinay Mishra, AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, president of the AAP’s Delhi unit Saurabh Bharawaj, and Devesh Vishwakarma, who is said to be involved in the AAP’s social media operations.

The allegedly contemptuous posts by the AAP leaders were made after Justice Sharma refused to recuse from hearing the pleas filed by the CBI and ED in the excise policy case.

While transferring the cases out of her court, Justice Sharma had clarified that the transfer “should not be understood as this court transferring the matter merely because demands for recusal were made which were rejected by a detailed order…”.

CBI has a revision plea pending before the HC challenging the discharge of the 23 accused in the case by a trial court in February. The ED has sought the expungement of alleged adverse remarks made against the agency by the trial court.

While the pleas by the CBI and ED will be heard by Justice Manoj Jain, the suo motu contempt proceedings will be heard by a Division Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja, also on Tuesday.

Story continues below this ad

According to the current roster, Justice Jain deals with criminal matters, including pleas for bail, criminal appeals of the year 2026, and cases relating to sexual harassment.

As per instructions on the administrative side of the Delhi HC, all criminal revision petitions of the year 2021 pending before the Bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, except criminal cases relating to sitting/ former Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly, are heard by Justice Manoj Jain.

Justice Jain obtained a degree in law from Panjab University, Chandigarh in 1986, and joined the Delhi Judicial Service in 1992. He was promoted to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service in 2003.

Justice Jain served as the Director (Academics) at the Delhi Judicial Academy, and as the Registrar General of the HC before he was elevated to the Bench. He was sworn in as an additional judge of the Delhi HC in May 2023, and was made a permanent judge in July 2024.

Story continues below this ad

Justice Jain has presided over civil, criminal, and family law cases, and is no stranger to cases involving political leaders. He is currently hearing a challenge by Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad against a trial court’s order framing corruption and criminal conspiracy charges against him and members of his family in the alleged land-for-jobs scam.

In March, Justice Jain had restrained the CBI from examining approvers in the case until the court had decided on the petitions filed by Lalu Prasad and his aide Bhola Yadav.

Justice Jain was part of a Division Bench led by Justice Suresh Kait in the Delhi HC that heard the bail pleas of the accused in the larger conspiracy case in the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots.

As a single judge, he is hearing a plea by businessman Robert Vadra, the husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, challenging the charges framed against him and issuing summons to him in a case of alleged money laundering in a 2008 Gurgaon land deal.

Story continues below this ad

Justice Jain had earlier dealt with a case involving a dispute over the custody of a pet involving Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra and lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai.

In late 2024 early 2025, Justice Jain had flagged a recurring trend where individuals were forced to approach the court for relief after banks froze entire accounts on suspicion of fraudulent transactions.

In December 2024, Justice Jain had also briefly dealt with a contempt petition filed by former diplomat Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri against TMC MP Saket Gokhale for failing to comply with the directions of court in a 2021 defamation suit filed by Puri.

Sohini Ghosh is a Senior Correspondent at The Indian Express. Previously based in Ahmedabad covering Gujarat, she recently moved to the New Delhi bureau, where she primarily covers legal developments at the Delhi High Court Professional Profile Background: An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism (ACJ), she previously worked with ET NOW before joining The Indian Express. Core Beats: Her reporting is currently centered on the Delhi High Court, with a focus on high-profile constitutional disputes, disputes over intellectual property, criminal and civil cases, issues of human rights and regulatory law (especially in the areas of technology and healthcare). Earlier Specialty: In Gujarat, she was known for her rigorous coverage in the beats of crime, law and policy, and social justice issues, including the 2002 riot cases, 2008 serial bomb blast case, 2016 flogging of Dalits in Una, among others. She has extensively covered health in the state, including being part of the team that revealed the segregation of wards at the state’s largest government hospital on lines of faith in April 2020. With Ahmedabad being a UNESCO heritage city, she has widely covered urban development and heritage issues, including the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reporting from the Delhi High Court covers major political, constitutional, corporate, and public-interest legal battles: High-Profile Case Coverage She has extensively covered the various legal battles - including for compensation under the aegis of North East Delhi Riots Claims Commission - pertaining to the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, as well as 1984 anti-Sikh riots. She has also led coverage at the intersection of technology and governance, and its impact on the citizenry, from, and beyond courtrooms — such as the government’s stakeholder consultations for framing AI-Deepfake policy. Signature Style Sohini is recognized for her sustained reporting from courtrooms and beyond. She specialises in breaking down dense legal arguments to make legalese accessible for readers. Her transition from Gujarat to Delhi has seen her expand her coverage on regulatory, corporate and intellectual property law, while maintaining a strong commitment to human rights and lacuna in the criminal justice system. X (Twitter): @thanda_ghosh ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments