‘Delay tactics’: Karnataka High Court denies bail to UAPA accused, flags 190+ applications, changing lawyers
UAPA accused bail rejected: Justices K S Mudagal and Venkatesh Naik T observed that the accused were following a pattern of invariably filing consecutive applications for bail, interim bail, etc., and frequently changing advocates.
4 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Dec 23, 2025 08:16 AM IST
Karnataka High Court bail ruling: The Karnataka High Court rejected the appeal filed by the UAPA accused challenging the trial court’s bail rejection, observing that the delay was caused by the accused’s own tactics. (This image is generated using AI)
Karnataka High Court bail denial: Underlining the “delay tactics” of the accused, which included filing over 190 applications and frequently changing lawyers, the Karnataka High Court has upheld the order of the trial court rejecting their bail applications.
A bench of Justices K S Mudagal and Venkatesh Naik T was hearing the appeal challenging the trial court’s bail rejection order against three accused who were booked under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
“The accused are following a pattern of invariably filing consecutive applications for bail, interim bail, discharge, summoning documents etc, though such applications could have been filed collectively wherever they are represented through a common advocate, ” the court observed.
Referring to another strategy adopted by the accused, namely changing advocates continuously and such lawyers seeking adjournments, the court said, “The delay cannot be attributed either to the prosecution or the trial court.”
The order added, “The accused being themselves cause for delay cannot be permitted to reap the benefit of their own mistake on the ground of delay.”
The accused persons, who were members of the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), were charged along with 135 more accused under the UAPA and various provisions of the IPC for their alleged roles in the August 11, 2020, violence that targeted the K.G. Halli and D.J. Halli police stations.
The court noted that there were more than 193 bail applications filed by the accused in five years, apart from other applications seeking the use of Instagram accounts, releasing mobile phones, and other reliefs.
The accused’s representative, Mohammed Tahir, argued that his clients were falsely implicated in the case and submitted that while the case was initially investigated by the state police, after the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the probe, it concocted witness statements and records against the accused.
Tahir also contended that his clients are in judicial custody for five years, and yet the trial has not commenced and is not likely to be concluded in the near future.
On the contrary, the special public prosecutor P Prasanna Kumar, while justifying the reasoning of the trial court regarding the blameworthy conduct of the accused in delaying the matter, placed on record a detailed list of bail applications and other proceedings initiated by the accused before the trial court and the high court to delay the trial.
Background
As per the state, the case stemmed from the accused posting some derogatory messages to insult Hindu Gods and provoke the Hindu community through a Facebook account on Sri Krishna Janmashtami and deliberately tagging P Naveen, nephew of an MLA, to provoke him. The nephew, in return, posted a cartoon picture with a comment on Prophet Mohammed.
Story continues below this ad
This led to a group of people approaching the K.G.Halli police station, who began shouting slogans demanding the arrest of Naveen, and subsequently the group of rioters allegedly set fire to 12 government and private vehicles and damaged property of around Rs 13.62 lakh.
It was also alleged that the mob attempted to snatch weapons from the police personnel and kill them, which led to an order to open fire, resulting in the death of one person.
Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape.
Expertise
Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen.
Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on:
Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.
Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy.
Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More