Premium

Chandigarh flyover vs heritage: Punjab and Haryana HC flags environmental compliance as May deadline looms

Amicus cites master plan violations and heritage risks for the proposed Tribune Chowk flyover; UT relies on 2024 order vacating stay, cites traffic urgency

4 min readChandigarhApr 22, 2026 05:26 PM IST

The amicus curiae sought a ban on tree felling in Chandigarh on the lines of Punjab.

With the Union Territory administration indicating that work on the proposed Tribune Chowk flyover may begin in early May, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday took up detailed arguments in the case, with Chief Justice Sheel Nagu observing that although the earlier stay had been vacated, the administration must comply with all environmental impact assessments and necessary permissions before proceeding.

The bench, also comprising Justice Sanjiv Berry, posted the matter for further hearing a day after, even as amicus curiae Tanu Bedi pressed for an expedited final decision.

Appearing before the division bench, Bedi said that while no interim relief was being pressed, the matter needed to be decided expeditiously before any third-party rights were created. She also sought a ban on tree felling in Chandigarh on the lines of Punjab.

Violation of Chandigarh master plan

Bedi argued that the Chandigarh Master Plan (CMP) 2031, notified under the Capital of Punjab Act, 1952 and the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952, was a statutory document and could not be bypassed. She submitted that the plan does not recommend the construction of flyovers within the city and mandates that alternative traffic management measures be exhausted first.

She pointed to proposals such as a ring road, smart mobility planning and mass transit systems, including a metro, which, she said, had not been adequately explored before the flyover was proposed.

Questioning the decision-making process, Bedi said the project had been cleared by a subcommittee of the Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee that lacked the authority to approve a “major intervention” like a flyover, as its mandate was limited to the Capital Complex and routine heritage matters.

She further submitted that the engineering department had proceeded with a “preset mind”, citing the floating of tenders in 2017, before flyover construction experience, even before feasibility studies or traffic assessments were carried out.

Story continues below this ad

Bedi also relied on a series of communications between 2018 and 2020 from the Chief Architect and the Department of Urban Planning, opposing the project, stating that it violated the Master Plan and that no formal concurrence had been granted.

Heritage and environmental concerns

The amicus curiae contended that the project would impact a Grade 1 heritage site, the mango orchards, and involve the felling of mature trees, leading to irreversible ecological damage.

She also raised concerns that the flyover would terminate in front of the Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, a designated silence zone, potentially affecting hospital functioning.

Referring to a public hearing conducted in December 2019, Bedi told the court that 46 participants had opposed the project while only 21 supported it.

Story continues below this ad

She further argued that the Indian Road Congress guidelines, which require authorities to exhaust all other traffic management options before proposing a flyover, had not been followed.

UT cites prior orders, infrastructure needs

Opposing the plea, UT senior standing counsel Amit Jhanji submitted that a division bench of the High Court had already vacated the stay on the project on April 30, 2024, after considering all aspects, including environmental concerns.

He said the order had attained finality after a Special Leave Petition challenging it was withdrawn before the Supreme Court on September 17, 2024.

Jhanji also relied on Section 41HA of the Specific Relief Act to argue that courts are barred from granting injunctions that delay infrastructure projects.

Urban growth and traffic pressures

Story continues below this ad

Highlighting the need for the project, Jhanji submitted that Chandigarh, originally planned for a population of about 5 lakh, now caters to a tri-city population exceeding 15 lakh.

He said commuters entering from Zirakpur and Delhi face traffic congestion lasting up to 1.5 hours, making the flyover a necessary intervention.

The project site, he added, lies at the junction of Sectors 29 and 31, marking the beginning of Phase 2 of the city, which was envisaged for higher-density development.

Environmental safeguards, delays

Jhanji told the court that 2,799 saplings had already been planted as compensatory afforestation at a 5:1 ratio for trees proposed to be felled.

Story continues below this ad

He added that the administration would obtain all required environmental clearances and conduct impact assessments before commencing construction.

He further argued that litigation since 2019 had stalled the project, leading to cost overruns and delaying the city’s development.

During the hearing, Bedi had also suggested that the case could be taken up even on a non-working Saturday or Sunday to ensure expeditious disposal.

Manraj Grewal Sharma

Manraj Grewal Sharma is a senior journalist and the Resident Editor of The Indian Express in Chandigarh, where she leads the newspaper’s coverage of north India’s most politically and institutionally significant regions. From Punjab and Haryana to Himachal Pradesh and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, she oversees reporting at the intersection of governance, law, politics and society. She also reports on the diaspora, especially in Canada and the US. With a career spanning journalism across several countries, academia and international development, Manraj brings a rare depth of perspective to regional reporting. She is widely regarded as a leading chronicler of Punjab’s contemporary history and socio-political evolution, particularly its long shadow of militancy, federal tensions and identity politics. Her book, Dreams after Darkness, remains a definitive account of the militancy years and their enduring aftermath. Professional Background & Expertise A gold medalist in mass communication and a post-graduate in English literature, Manraj has a multifaceted career spanning journalism, academia, and international development. She was also awarded a fellowship by National Foundation of India and did several in-depth pieces on Manipur. Internationally, she has reported from Israel, US, UK, Myanmar, and Mauritius Her key focus areas include: Regional Politics, History, Agriculture, Diaspora, and Security. Of late, she has started focusing on Legal & Judicial Affairs: Much of her recent work involves reporting on high-stakes cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ranging from environmental policy to civil rights. International Consulting: She previously served as a consulting editor for the Asia Pacific Adaptation Network and a publishing consultant for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. Academia: For five years, she was the managing editor of Gender, Technology and Development, a peer-reviewed international journal at the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok. Recent Notable Articles (Late 2025) Her recent reportage focuses heavily on judicial interventions and regional governance: 1. Environment & Governance "‘NGT can’t test legality of policy’: HC hears challenge to Punjab’s ‘Green Habitat’ plan" (Dec 22, 2025): Covering a critical legal battle over whether the National Green Tribunal has the authority to strike down a state policy regularizing farmhouses on delisted forest land. "High court pulls up Punjab poll panel over audio clip probe" (Dec 10, 2025): Reporting on judicial concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of local body elections. 2. Legal Rights & Social Welfare "HC issues notice to Punjab, Haryana over delay in building old age homes" (Dec 22, 2025): Reporting on a contempt petition against top officials for failing to establish government-run homes for the elderly as promised in 2019. "Victims can appeal acquittals in sessions court without seeking special leave" (Dec 19, 2025): Highlighting a significant procedural shift in criminal law following a Supreme Court ruling. "HC upholds benefits for Punjab FCI officer acquitted in 20-year-old bribery case" (Dec 19, 2025): A report on the concept of "honourable acquittal" and its impact on employee benefits. 3. Human Rights & Identity "As Punjab denies parole to MP Amritpal Singh, HC asks it to submit ‘foundational material’" (Dec 1, 2025): Covering the legal proceedings regarding the radical preacher and sitting MP's request to attend Parliament. "Protecting life paramount: HC backs Muslim woman in live-in after verbal divorce" (Nov 6, 2025): Analyzing judicial protections for personal liberty in the context of traditional practices. Signature Beats Manraj is recognized for her ability to decode complex judicial rulings and relate them to the everyday lives of citizens. Whether it is a 30-year-old land battle in Fazilka or the political implications of Kangana Ranaut’s candidacy in Mandi, her writing provides deep historical and regional context. Contact @grewal_sharma on X manrajgrewalsharma on Instagram ... Read More

Loading Recommendations...

May 18: Latest News

Live Blog