Cancer patient dies after ‘delayed care’, hospital, 2 doctors to pay Rs 5 lakh

A Delhi consumer commission was hearing a complaint alleging medical negligence in the treatment of a woman with advanced breast cancer who later developed acute gallbladder inflammation.

Delhi Consumer Commission Medical Negligence Hospital Doctor Compensation Consumer NewsThe commission said the gallbladder surgery revealed dense adhesions, gangrene, perforation and an abscess, following which a drain was left in place. (Image generated using AI)

A Delhi Consumer Commission has ordered a private hospital and two doctors to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation to a complainant after holding them liable for medical negligence over an eight-day delay in properly treating an advanced cancer patient’s acute gallbladder infection. The commission found that the delay led to worsening of the condition, with the gallbladder later found to be gangrenous and perforated, and said the compensation included litigation costs.

President Suresh Kumar Gupta and member Harshali Kaur of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, South-West Delhi were hearing a complaint by a man alleging medical negligence in the treatment of his wife who was suffering from advanced breast cancer with brain metastasis.

“This inordinate delay in diagnosing the acute cholecystitis and managing it properly led to worsening of the condition,” the commission said on September 21, holding that the delay in treating the gallbladder inflammation amounted to medical negligence.

The commission directed the hospital and two doctors to jointly pay Rs 5 lakh to the complainant towards compensation for mental and physical agony, inclusive of litigation costs. The amount has to be paid within three months, failing which 6 per cent annual interest will apply from December 23, 2019, the date the complaint was filed, until realisation.

What happened after emergency visit

The woman was being treated for advanced breast cancer with brain metastasis and other medical conditions. When she reached the hospital emergency on January 17, 2019, she complained of abdominal pain and had mild fever. An ultrasound showed a partially distended gallbladder containing sludge, with its wall thickened and swollen, indicating acute cholecystitis. Her total leukocyte count was also recorded at 20,000.

The commission noted that these findings pointed towards infection and said further investigations and intervention should have been undertaken earlier. She went to the surgery outpatient department on January 19 and was admitted.

A Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was advised on January 22. Its report, received on January 23, showed cholecystitis with a pericholecystic collection and suspected gallbladder rupture. She underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy on January 25. The surgical findings included dense adhesions, gangrene, perforation, and an abscess. A drain was left in place because of the abscess and the condition of the gallbladder.

Story continues below this ad

The woman was readmitted on January 28 after suffering seizures and was discharged on February 8 on request. Hospital records stated that her prognosis had been explained and that the family wanted to take her home for best supportive care. She later died in hospital on February 18, 2019, due to cardio-pulmonary arrest.

No negligence in cancer treatment

The commission specifically held the hospital and two treating doctors responsible for the delay in managing the gallbladder inflammation. It said the hospital and two doctors failed to provide the standard level of care expected when the woman came to the emergency department with severe stomach pain on January 17, 2019, and were therefore guilty of medical negligence.

Three other doctors named in the complaint were absolved of negligence because the commission found no clear evidence establishing negligence against them.

The commission did not find negligence in the treatment of the woman’s advanced cancer or attribute all her subsequent complications to the hospital. A medical expert opinion obtained during the proceedings described her as suffering from terminal cancer and multiple co-morbidities.

Story continues below this ad

It recorded that she had received palliative radiotherapy for brain metastasis and concluded that treatment provided by the surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, neurosurgeon, gastrointestinal surgeon and medical oncologist was the standard of care.

The commission also rejected the allegation that brain radiotherapy caused the gallbladder rupture, noting that the radiation was localised to the brain. It found that the anti-seizure treatment given to the patient was in accordance with medical care.

Takeaway

Patients and their families should not ignore persistent or worsening symptoms. If a hospital identifies signs of a serious infection, they can ask what further tests or treatment are needed, seek a second medical opinion when concerned, and keep copies of prescriptions, test reports and treatment records.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Delhi: 1800-11-4000) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Story continues below this ad

Do not miss out on these stories:

Man wins Rs 1 lakh consumer payout after restaurant ‘hikes’ per head buffet price

‘Emergency treatment’ claim during US visit rejected, woman wins Rs 9 lakh from insurer

Rs 2.98 lakh for foreign travel date change? Tour firm to refund Rs 5.43 lakh, pay Rs 50k

Vineet Upadhyay is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express (Digital), where he leads specialized coverage of the Indian judicial system. Expertise Specialized Legal Authority: Vineet has spent the better part of his career analyzing the intricacies of the law. His expertise lies in "demystifying" judgments from the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, and District Courts. His reporting covers a vast spectrum of legal issues, including: Constitutional & Civil Rights: Reporting on landmark rulings regarding privacy, equality, and state accountability. Criminal Justice & Enforcement: Detailed coverage of high-profile cases involving the Enforcement Directorate (ED), NIA, and POCSO matters. Consumer Rights & Environmental Law: Authoritative pieces on medical negligence compensation, environmental protection (such as the "living person" status of rivers), and labor rights. Over a Decade of Professional Experience: Prior to joining The Indian Express, he served as a Principal Correspondent/Legal Reporter for The Times of India and held significant roles at The New Indian Express. His tenure has seen him report from critical legal hubs, including Delhi and Uttarakhand. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments