Can one spouse’s age stop a couple from IVF? Calcutta High Court steps in for 58-year-old man
Calcutta High Court IVF age limit: Justice Krishna Rao was hearing the plea of a married couple seeking to conceive a child via IVF where the wife is 47-years-old, and the husband is 58-years-old.
4 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Jan 20, 2026 12:04 PM IST
Calcutta High Court News: The Calcutta High Court found that the couple was not challenging the vires of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021. (Image is created using AI)
Calcutta High Court News: Holding the wife satisfies the age criteria, the Calcutta High Court recently granted relief to a married couple seeking the benefits of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), including IVF, despite the husband being over the prescribed age limit.
Justice Krishna Rao noted that the wife is 47-year-old while the husband is 58-year-old, seeking ART services to conceive a child and found that the couple’s first child died at the age of 28 years in December 2024, and the other one is mentally and physically challenged.
Justice Krishna Rao noted that the 47-year-old wife is medically fit and capable to to look after the children. (Image is enhanced using AI)
“The court holds that the petitioners will be entitled to have the benefit of assisted productive technology and can approach an appropriate clinic for having such services in view of the fact that one of the two spouses that is the petitioner no.1 (the wife) qualifies on the upper age limit ..irrespective of the fact that the other spouse does not so qualify,” the court said.
Justice Rao noted that the couple decided to visit an infertility clinic to conduct the process of IVF on the advice of the well-wishers and family members.
It was found that the couple in their petition has not challenged any vires of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, but has only sought relief by referring to various other judgments passed by this court in similar matters.
The court noted that the wife is under the prescribed age limit of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, but the husband has surpassed the prescribed age limit to avail such benefits.
The wife has the capacity to look after the children and has moved to the hospital to undergo the IVF process for another child.
It was further noted that the couple visited the ART clinic in July 2025, where the doctor had opined that the wife is eligible for pregnancy, but because of the husband’s age, the court’s permission is required for further treatment to adopt the IVF process.
The high court instructed the clinic to consider the couple’s request and left it to the clinic’s discretion to decide whether donor gametes or the over-aged husband’s gamete may be used for availing the ART services.
Arguments
One of the counsels appearing for the couple, advocate Deblina Lahiri, submitted and referred the previous judgments of the Calcutta High Court along with the Kerala High Court to stregthen thir case.
On the contrary, representing the state, advocate Partha Ghosh opposed the plea of the couple and argued that they have challenged the vires of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021.
Other courts on ART, age limit
In a previous and unrelated matter, the Gauhati High Court dismissed a plea of a married couple challenging the provision dealing with the age limits in the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021.
The court noted that the provision pointing to the availing of the Assisted Reproductive Technology has a prescribed age limit for both husband and wife and found it to be based on “considerations of medical science, ethical standards, and the welfare of both the woman undergoing treatment and the child to be born”.
Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape.
Expertise
Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen.
Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on:
Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.
Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy.
Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More