‘Same employer, perennial job’: After 40 years on contract, Calcutta High Court orders coal firm to regularise 16 workers
The Calcutta High Court upheld an industrial tribunal’s finding that the management of Bhojudih Coal Washery was unjustified in failing to departmentalise the workers.
Calcutta High Court news: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a plea filed by Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) and upheld a 2010 industrial tribunal award that ordered the departmentalisation of 16 contract workers who have been engaged in service for 40 years.
Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) was dealing with a plea of BCCL against the tribunal order to treat the workers as regular employees in the grade-I general mazdoor category, effective from their date of engagement, with all associated service benefits.
Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) heard the matter on February 17.
“The 16 referred workers have put in about 40 years of service, working under the same principal employer, being the petitioner here, doing work perennial in nature,” the court said on February 17.
The matter originates from a reference to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), Asansol’s 2010 order to departmentalise 16 workers.
The tribunal has previously found that the management of the Bhojudih Coal Washery, which comes under BCCL, was unjustified in failing to departmentalise 16 workers employed in the maintenance of the water supply system.
The 2010 award directed BCCL to treat these individuals as regular employees in the grade-I general mazdoor category, effective from their date of engagement, with all associated service benefits.
BCCL challenged this award, arguing that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, and asserting that the work was seasonal, limited to channelling water during summer months.
Appearing for the BCCL, advocates Saikat Ray Chowdhury and Aritra Ghosh submitted that the tribunal adjudicating the issue under reference did not deal with the question while passing the impugned award.
They further argued that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to pass the said award, and it was only the appropriate government who is the authority to consider the case under Section 10 of the Contract
Labour (Regulation and Abolition Act), 1970.
They submitted that under Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the appropriate government could refer any dispute for adjudication before the Industrial Tribunal only where the matters are related to/specified in the second schedule or third schedule of the said Act.
Workers’ demand
The union, on behalf of the workers, claimed the absorption of the contract workers upon comparing their work under Bhojudih Coal Washery with that of Dugda Coal Washery and Patherdih Coal Washery.
They argued that since contract workers of the Dugda Coal Washery and the Patherdih Coal Washery were made permanent, their employment was also required to be made permanent on that ground.
The union has urged for directions to the management for regularisation of the service of the referred workmen by taking them on the permanent roll of the company as category-1 general mazdoor, and allow them all the benefits with effect from January 1983.
They further argued that the Bhojudih Coal Washery awards the contract and the contractors engage the labour. The same set of labour has been engaged on the said job for the last 40 years continuously.
Jagriti Rai works with The Indian Express, where she writes from the vital intersection of law, gender, and society. Working on a dedicated legal desk, she focuses on translating complex legal frameworks into relatable narratives, exploring how the judiciary and legislative shifts empower and shape the consciousness of citizens in their daily lives.
Expertise
Socio-Legal Specialization: Jagriti brings a critical, human-centric perspective to modern social debates. Her work focuses on how legal developments impact gender rights, marginalized communities, and individual liberties.
Diverse Editorial Background: With over 4 years of experience in digital and mainstream media, she has developed a versatile reporting style. Her previous tenures at high-traffic platforms like The Lallantop and Dainik Bhaskar provided her with deep insights into the information needs of a diverse Indian audience.
Academic Foundations:
Post-Graduate in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), India’s premier media training institute.
Master of Arts in Ancient History from Banaras Hindu University (BHU), providing her with the historical and cultural context necessary to analyze long-standing social structures and legal evolutions. ... Read More