Premium

Bombay High Court quashes eviction order against sons, says father must prove ‘inability to maintain himself’

Every conflict between a senior citizen and his offspring would not fall under the jurisdiction of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, the Bombay High Court observed.

bombay high court senior citizen sons evictionThe tribunal had recorded a finding that the father was not entitled to maintenance, the Bomby High Court noted. (Image generated using AI)

Bombay High Court news: The Bombay High Court recently quashed an eviction order passed against two sons under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, while observing that every conflict between a senior citizen and their offspring will not attract the remedial jurisdiction of the Act.

Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan set aside the order passed by the maintenance tribunal which had directed the sons to vacate a slum unit owned by their father.

justice Somasekhar Sundaresan bombay high court Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan set aside the maintenance tribunal’s order on February 9.

The court noted that the tribunal had itself recorded a finding that the father was not entitled to maintenance, as he had failed to establish that he was unable to maintain himself.

“The impugned order sets out to focus solely on the entitlement of the father in his capacity as the senior citizen under Section 4 of the Act, but loses sight of the fact that the jurisdictional fact necessary for such entitlement, and for the remedy of enforcement of such entitlement to be granted, is the proven inability of the senior citizen to maintain himself,” the Bombay High Court observed in an order dated February 9.

Background

  • On February 2, 2024, the petitioners (sons) were directed by the maintenance tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to vacate the premises owned by their father, which they occupied.
  • Feeling aggrieved by the eviction order, the sons approached the Bombay High Court, contending that the jurisdiction of the Act would be attracted when a senior citizen is unable to maintain himself.
  • It was further submitted that their father was living on different premises and that there was nothing to indicate that he would need to live on the premises from which eviction of the sons had been directed.

What were the court’s observations?

  • Section 4(1) of the Act creates an entitlement in a senior citizen to make an application for maintenance under Section 5 of the Act. Section 4(2) creates an obligation on the offspring of the senior citizen to maintain the senior citizen parent by providing for the needs to lead a normal life.
  • These two elements of Section 4 do not operate in a vacuum. Such entitlement and such obligation would apply where the senior citizen makes out a case of inability to maintain himself out of his earnings and earnings from his property.
  • The maintenance tribunal positively reached a conclusion that it would not be appropriate to grant maintenance to the father who has an income from a pension.
  • The tribunal pointed out that the father had not set out his expenses and needs for maintaining a normal life. The income from pension is also not set out.
  • Therefore, when the tribunal has positively stated that there is a need to take a holistic reading of Section 4, Section 5 and Section 23 (transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances), it ought to have considered that in its own analysis, it had returned a finding that the father is not entitled to be maintained.
  • By necessary implication, the jurisdictional fact for falling within the ambit of Section 4 is a requirement to be met for purposes of Section 23. Therefore, each and every case of conflict between a senior citizen and his offspring would not be covered by the remedial jurisdiction of the Act.
  • It would be necessary for the parties to fall within the ambit and scope of the legislative intent and coverage of the Act, and with it, comes the necessary ingredient of demonstrating the inability to maintain oneself.
  • When one applies the above analysis to the facts of the case, unmistakably, the maintenance tribunal has returned a finding that it would not be appropriate to grant maintenance to the father.
  • Indeed, one can take a view that the needs for a normal life are not just financial needs but also emotional needs, but that would be a declaration of the law in aid of a factual matrix where there is harassment and disharmony in a shared living space, necessitating remedies.
  • In this case, there is hardly any scope for analysis of whether maintenance of emotional needs is relevant inasmuch as the parties have separated and lived separately for long, and the property that the sons have been asked to vacate is not the property in which the senior citizen lives.
  • The sons have indeed made out a case for intervention in exercise of its writ jurisdiction to quash and set aside the impugned order.

What is Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007?

The maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens Act contains provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens. It provides for establishment of old-age homes, medical support for senior citizens and measures for publicity, awareness, etc., for welfare of senior citizens.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience. Expertise Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents. Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes: Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments