Premium

‘For them, life comes only once’: Bombay High Court orders immediate release of 50 seafarers on 3 stranded vessels

The seafarers claimed they were stranded inside the vessels since February 9 and that the owners had ‘practically abandoned’ the ships as well as deserted the crew in the Arabian Sea.

Bombay High Court stranded in seaThe stranded seafarers appeared before the Bombay High Court on Tuesday. The court was hearing a plea where the petitioners claimed they were in wrongful confinement for nearly three months on board three arrested vessels in the Arabian Sea. (Express Photo)

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday ordered the immediate release of 50 crew members stranded on three vessels in the Arabian Sea, who described themselves as “victims of a high-seas humanitarian crisis”, observing that “for them life comes only once”. The seafarers, all Indians, expressed their desire not to return to the vessels.

The petitioners and other crew members, who had filed a habeas corpus plea, belonged to three motor tankers named MT Asphalt Star, MT Stellar Ruby, and MT Al Jafzia, placed under arrest for illegal fuel oil and bitumen transfers. Only one of the 50 was named an accused in the case.

The petitioners, represented through the Maharashtra Navnirman Navin Sena Union, claimed they were stranded inside the vessels since February 9, and the owners had “practically abandoned” the ships as well as deserted the crew in the Arabian Sea.

The vessels were intercepted by the Indian Coast Guard (ICG), and the ships were under arrest by the Yellow Gate police over alleged illegal acts in the Arabian Sea, at a distance of 11 nautical miles from Mumbai.

On Monday, a bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge and Hiten S Venegavkar expressed concern over their safety and sought crew members’ presence before the court, observing that they cared for humans and not the dead vessels.

On Tuesday, Justice Ghuge quipped to the lawyers representing the owners of the vessels, who raised apprehensions about the vessels being unmanned if all the crew members were released without any replacement.

The judge orally remarked, “We will release all of them today itself. You take care of your vessels and commercial activities. We will take care of human life. You can read their faces. The happiness of breathing ‘free air’ and being on ‘mother earth’. And they must be feeling so relieved to be on land. We will allow them to be happy for some time. And we are sure when you replace them with another complement of staff, you will stop the petitioners’ salaries and you will start paying them (the replaced crew) the salaries.”

Story continues below this ad

“For them life comes only once, and they have to feed their family members. There must be at least four other mouths who are dependent on them, including wife, children and old parents. You will not think of that. It is only the court of law that will think of that. For you, the monies are very important and not the human lives…Now we cannot hold them back. Now the owners have to decide how the ships have to be taken care of, whether temporarily you will bring them closer to the inner anchorage or move the vessels to the Alang Ship Breaking Yard,” Justice Ghuge added.

‘No reason to detain any of them’

Bombay High Court stranded seafarers The Bombay High Court was informed that the seafarers were only supplied 300 millilitres of drinking water daily per person, with no other cooking means, and were suffering ‘tremendously’. (Express Photo)

The petitioners had claimed that they were in wrongful confinement for nearly three months and sought directions from the court to allow them to “sign-off, disembark” and be repatriated.

Advocate Padmavati Vaishya, for the petitioners, argued that they were held as “human collateral” on “dead ships” after a First Information Report lodged in February, despite no involvement in the alleged commercial fraud perpetrated by the vessels’ owners.

Vaishya interacted with each of the 50 seafarers present in the court, and each confirmed he did not desire to return to the vessel.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioners argued they were supplied only 300 millilitres of drinking water daily per person, with no other cooking means, were preparing chapatis/rotis by burning wood, and were suffering “tremendously”.

Investigating officer Police Inspector Ravindra Mohite confirmed he interacted with them after they reached the shore, and none of them desired to return. The seafarers reiterated this to the judges and also raised concerns about pending salaries.

“Since all these 50 are adults, we have no reason to detain any of them under any compulsion as may be voiced by the owners of the vessels, keeping in view that they claim to have suffered starvation and thirst while on the vessels,” the high court held and directed authorities to complete formalities to set them free.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments