Premium

‘Bishop not entitled to plough cemetery like a field’: Madras High Court intervenes in church cemetery dispute

Madras High Court Church Dispute: Justice L Victoria Gowri said that the right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution includes the “right to dignity in death” and the “right to decent burial”.

The Madras High Court intervened in a church cemetery dispute holding that the Bishop is not entitled to ‘plough cemetery like a field’.Madras HC Cemetery Case: The Madras High Court intervened in a church cemetery dispute holding that the Bishop is not entitled to ‘plough cemetery like a field’. (This image is generated using AI)

Madras High Court Church Dispute News: The Madras High Court recently intervened in a church cemetery dispute, holding that the matter was not merely about property rights, but was touching on the deeply sensitive issue of the “dignity of the dead” and the sanctity of a Christian cemetery maintained by a Parish church.

Justice L Victoria Gowri was hearing the plea, filed by a parish member, who alleged that the church officials, in January, demolished the existing graves and tombs in a century-old cemetery, using three JCBs, without the consent of the families of the deceased or the broader church membership.

The high court noted that the tomb structures of existing graves were demolished without consultation or consent of the concerned families and said that it prima facie attracts the definition of “offering indignity to any human corpse” and “trespass in any place of sepulture”.

Responding to the the church office-bearers’s argument that under “canon law and ecclesiastical hierarchy”, the Bishop and Parish priest exercise ownership and control over church properties, including cemeteries, and can “permit demolition of tombs” in the cemetery, the court said that any holder of property, particularly religious property dedicated to public or community use, is a “trustee” subject to constitutional limitations, human rights norms and statutory restrictions.

“Describing the Bishop as ‘title holder’ does not mean that he has an absolute right to ‘plough the cemetery like a field’,” the court said.

The court observed that the church cemetery is a “sacred trust” held for the benefit of the faithful and for posterity, indicating that it is not a disposable asset in the hands of “administrators”.

Noting that the trial court did not examine the matter on merits due to the absence of a requisite supporting affidavit, Justice Gowri directed the matter to be remanded to the trial court, observing that the defect was curable and the petitioners should be given an opportunity to file the affidavit before passing any order on merits.

Story continues below this ad

Century-old cemetery, demolition

The court noted that the cemetery concerned is century old where families of church members are buried in the common cemetery. The petitioner submitted that the family used to pay Rs 20,000 for each burial as a fee for the grave space.

It was further pointed out that the said graveyard has been used and maintained as a “sacred burial site” for generations of the parishioners.

Right to decent burial

Referring to the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the court pointed out that it includes the “right to dignity in death” and the “right to decent burial”.

The order added, “Human dignity attaches not only to the living but also to the dead, and that proper treatment of human remains and burial is an integral aspect of that dignity”.

Story continues below this ad

The high court also referred to several international laws and acknowledged that these decisions have persuasive value and reinforce the universal principle that “burial grounds and cemeteries are loci of human dignity, privacy, family memory and cultural identity, and that their arbitrary demolition or desecration is incompatible with contemporary human rights standards”.

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement