‘Promised’ Bangkok trip never happens, elderly couple wins Rs 65,000 from agency

The Telangana couple claimed that they had booked a tour package through the agency to travel to Bangkok in November 2024, but the trip never took place.

bangkok trip consumer court elderly couple travel agencyThe commission rejected the travel agency’s defence, pointing out that it failed to show that the Rs 50,000 paid was subject to any forfeiture or cancellation condition. (AI-generated image)

A Telangana consumer commission has awarded a couple Rs 65,000 after a travel agency allegedly failed to deliver them a promised Bangkok tour package. The couple had allegedly paid Rs 50,000 for the proposed tour, but the agency failed to show that it provided the assured services. Holding the agency deficient in service, the commission ordered the refund, while limiting the compensation to the amount backed by evidence.

President M Anuradha and members R Narayan Reddy and K Chandra Shekhar Reddy of the Mahabubnagar District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission were hearing the complaint by the couple, aged 67 and 62, who booked the tour package in 2024.

“The opposite party (travel agency), having received Rs 50,000 towards the proposed tour package and having failed to establish provision of the promised service or any contractual justification for retaining the said amount, is liable for deficiency in service,” the September 9 order read.

Trip that never materialised

The couple claimed that they approached the travel agency, along with a few other people, in August 2024 for a Bangkok tour package. The promised package for November allegedly included round-trip flight tickets from Hyderabad to Bangkok, three nights’ stay in Pattaya, Coral Island and Bangkok, local transportation, and accommodation in three-star hotels. The agency quoted Rs 19,999 per person for the package.

They paid Rs 50,000 online on August 31, 2024, including Rs 10,000 for two relatives, who later paid another Rs 30,000 to the agency but could not join the complaint.

Promotional offer: Agency

The travel company, through advocate M Jitender Reddy, said the package was a promotional offer subject to terms and conditions. It denied that the Rs 50,000 was accepted over any promise to accommodate the complainants or their relatives beyond the terms of the offer. The agency also disputed the claim that the relatives had paid Rs 30,000 and questioned the complainants’ authority to seek relief on their behalf.

The company also said the complainants could not be treated as “consumers” under the Consumer Protection Act because the package’s terms had not been fulfilled.

Story continues below this ad

‘Can’t retain amount’

The commission rejected the agency’s defence, noting that it had not produced the terms and conditions on which it relied. It also failed to show that the Rs 50,000 was subject to any forfeiture or cancellation condition or that the amount had been taken towards any service that was actually provided.

The commission mentioned that the complainants are entitled to a refund of the amount which the agency admittedly received. It said the commission is empowered to grant appropriate relief, including refund and compensation, if required.

Accordingly, the consumer forum directed the travel agency to refund Rs 50,000 to the complainants and to pay Rs 10,000 towards compensation for mental agony and inconvenience. It was also directed to pay Rs 5,000 towards costs within 45 days.

Takeaway

A travel agency cannot retain money received for a promised tour without showing that the service was provided or that it had a contractual basis to keep the amount, the commission held.

Story continues below this ad

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Telangana: 1800-4250-0333) and Union territories or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Don’t miss out on these stories:

‘Emergency treatment’ claim during US visit rejected, woman wins Rs 9 lakh from insurer

Warranty claim denied after Rs 13,000 shoes ‘damaged’ in 2 months, man wins Rs 21,000

Insurer rejects heart treatment claim over ‘no original records’, family wins Rs 13.8 lakh

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express (Digital), where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments