Premium

Two birth dates, two birthplaces sink Army cadet’s plea to change CBSE records

The Delhi High Court dismissed an Army cadet’s plea to correct his date of birth in CBSE records, citing an eight-year delay and conflicting birth certificates.

Army cadet with two birth certificate sought correction of his DOB in the CBSE records.

4 min readNew DelhiJun 5, 2026 03:30 PM IST First published on: Jun 5, 2026 at 03:30 PM IST

The Delhi High Court has dismissed an Army cadet’s plea seeking correction of his date of birth in CBSE records, holding that the request was made after eight years of issuance of his Class 10 certificate and that he relied on his two contradicting birth certificates showing two different dates and places of birth.

A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia observed that, given the two contradicting birth certificates, the appellant should first have the discrepancy resolved by the competent authority and thereafter approach CBSE for correction.

“The claim of the appellant is that his correct DOB is 14.09.1999. In the first certificate, it is described as 14.09.2000 whereas, in the second certificate it is described as 14.09.1999. …instead of rushing to the Court, correction in the birth certificate… sought by the appellant by approaching the appropriate authority under Section 15 of the Act, 1969 and thereafter prayer could have been made to CBSE to incorporate such correction in the certificate issued by it,” the June 4 order noted.

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia heard a matter over correction of the Army cadet’s DOB in CBSE records.

One man, two different birth certificates

The appellant is an Indian Army Cadet who graduated from the National Defence Academy (NDA) and joined the Indian Military Academy (IMA) in the year 2021-22.
He had sought correction in his date of birth in CBSE records from 14 September 2000 to 14 September 1999 and requested a fresh Class 10 certificate.
His first certificate was registered on December 7, 2002, and his place of birth was mentioned as Police Quarters, Naraina.
The second birth certificate was issued on November 26, 2023, and the place of birth was recorded as Jaipur Golden Hospital.
His CBSE Class 10 certificate was issued in 2016, and his date of birth was mentioned as September 14, 2000.
The single judge of the court dismissed his plea, holding that CBSE guidelines allowed such changes within one year of declaration of results.

Correction plea filed after eight years

The appellant had argued that his actual date of birth, September 14, 1999, was reflected in the certificate issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and also in the passport issued in his name earlier.
He contended that the one-year limitation for seeking correction in date of birth was only applicable before CBSE, and that does not bar this court from granting him relief in the petition instituted by him.
The opposite party had argued that he did not approach CBSE for correction of his date of birth within the one year to get it rectified.
The single judge, while dismissing his plea, observed that he had sought correction after eight years of issuance of the certificate, and therefore, no direction to CBSE could be issued to alter his date of birth in the records.

First get two birth certificates dispute resolved: Court

The Delhi High Court found that both the certificates were issued under the relevant provisions of the Delhi Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999, framed under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

The court noted that the appellant relied on two contradictory birth certificates that recorded different dates and places of birth, and recommended that he should first get the discrepancy in his birth records resolved before the competent authority under the law and only thereafter approach CBSE for correction in records.

The appellant did not move to CBSE or his school seeking correction of his date of birth within the one-year provision of CBSE, the court said and agreed with the single judge’s observation that the petition could not be used to bypass a limitation period that has already expired.

The court, while dismissing the plea, provided an alternative that the appellant could obtain a declaration from a competent civil court regarding his correct date of birth.

Somya Panwar

Somya Panwar works wi... Read More