Andhra man gets ‘defective’ fingerprint scanner, wins Rs 10,000 consumer payout

The commission found that the evidence furnished by the complainant clearly established that there was a deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in selling the defective device.

fingerprint scannerThe complainant alleged that he received a defective product. (Image generated using AI)

A district consumer commission in Andhra Pradesh recently directed an e-commerce platform, a seller and the manufacturer of a fingerprint scanner to jointly and severally refund Rs 6,310 and pay Rs 4,000 to a customer after finding deficiency in service over the sale of a ‘defective device’ and ‘failure’ to process the refund.

President Chintalapudi Kishore Kumar and member Sreelakshmi Rayala observed that the evidence furnished by the complainant clearly established deficiency in service from the opposite parties in selling a defective fingerprint scanner.

“Since the opposite parties failed to refund the price of the device in spite of several requests made by the complainant, the complainant suffered a lot of mental agony, the complainant is entitled to compensation,” the order dated July 31 read.

Online order and a ‘defective product’

According to the complainant, he had purchased a fingerprint scanner for Rs 6,310 through an e-commerce platform. He alleged that the scanner failed to capture fingerprints properly. After initiating a return through the e-commerce application, he received another scanner, which he claimed was also defective. The complainant stated that the money was never credited despite repeated follow-ups with customer care.

Feeling aggrieved, he approached the consumer commission seeking refund and compensation for mental agony.

The opposite parties argued that server logs showed the scanner was functional and had been successfully used on several occasions after the alleged defect, suggesting there was no manufacturing defect.

The commission noted that the complainant had produced invoices, return approval messages, refund status screenshots and photographs of the device in support of his case. It held that the opposite parties committed deficiency in service by selling the defective goods and not refunding the amount.

Story continues below this ad

“The opposite parties committed deficiency in service in selling the defective goods and not refunding the amount till now though the instrument was taken back in return policy. Thereby, it caused lot of mental agony and physical suffering to him,” the order read.

It further stated that, “The oral and documentary evidence adduced by the complainant clearly established that there is a deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in selling the defective device i.e., fingerprint scanner and failed to refund the amount in spite of the device being received back”.

Allowing the complaint, the commission directed the opposite parties to refund the purchase price with 9 per cent annual interest, pay Rs 3,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs 1,000 as litigation costs, and comply with the order within 30 days.

Takeaway

The ruling highlights that if a refund is not actually credited, leaving the consumer without either the product or the money, it constitutes a deficiency in service. The order reinforces that consumers are entitled not only to a refund with interest but also to compensation for the mental agony, inconvenience and harassment caused by the failure to complete the refund process,

Story continues below this ad

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Andhra Pradesh: 0866–2551431) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Don’t miss out on these stories

Flood-hit train cancelled, refund ‘denied’, Telangana senior citizen wins Rs 30,000

41-seater bus ‘overcrowded’ with 96 passengers, man wins Rs 15,000 payout

Gold coin ordered online never arrives, man wins Rs 60,000 from e-commerce platform

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express (Digital), where he specialises in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish covers court developments and key cases for the audience. Expertise Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of courts into clear, legal content. He also runs liveblogs from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes: Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law. Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates. Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments