15-hour ‘nightmare’ to New York: Why a Delhi consumer forum just ordered Air India to pay this passenger Rs 1.5 lakh
Air India compensation: A coram comprising President Poonam Chaudhry and Member Shekhar Chandra directed Air India to pay a compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh in a complaint filed by one Shailendra Bhatnagar and his daughter citing bad service.
5 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Jan 21, 2026 04:34 PM IST
Air India compensation: The consumer body said that Air India had maintained silence on a legal notice issued to it over the issue. (Image generated using AI)
Delhi New York flight issue: A Delhi consumer forum has directed Air India to pay a compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh to a passenger and his daughter for deficiency in service during a Delhi-New York international flight, alleging broken seats, malfunctioning in-flight entertainment systems, unhygienic washrooms and poor food service.
A coram comprising President Poonam Chaudhry and Member Shekhar Chandra, in a complaint filed by one Shailendra Bhatnagar and his daughter, citing a deficiency in service.
“If the airline fails to provide facilities that are mandatory under DGCA rules (like food, water, AC, communication, accommodation, or information about delay/cancellation), that amounts to ‘deficiency in service’,” said the January 14 order.
The complainant performed his first journey from Delhi to New York on September 6, 2023 and returned on September 13, 2023.
It was a long 15 hour journey.
The complainant sent a legal notice on November 1, 2023.
There is no answer to the legal notice.
In the legal notice all the allegations as made in the present complaint case are there but Air India maintained silence.
Had there been no fault with the services of Air India, surely the airlines must have reacted sharply.
During the course of arguments we were very specific to Air Indian as to why it has given a very vague reply of the complaint in which serious allegations relating to poor facilities and services of the airlines are made.
No satisfactory answer is given.
Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, an airline is a “service provider” and a passenger who has paid for a ticket is a “consumer”.
The passenger can then claim for refund and/or compensation.
The complainant is entitled for compensation for causing mental agony and harassment for not providing the facilities for which a considerable amount was charged by Air India.
This commission, therefore, directs Air India to pay Rs 50000 each to the complainant and his daughter as compensation and Rs 50000 as litigation expenses to the complainant.
We are not inclined to pay the ticket amount as they have already availed it.
In the legal notice, all the allegations as made in the present complaint case are there, but Air India maintained silence, the consumer forum said. (Image generated using AI)
Background
According to the complaint, Bhatnagar travelled with his daughter on Air India’s Delhi–New York–Delhi route in September 2023, flying economy class on flights AI-101 and AI-102.
The tickets were booked through MakeMyTrip, and the total cost of travel, including charges paid for a change in travel date, was about Rs 3.18 lakh.
The complainant alleged that the 15-hour journey was marred by several lapses, including broken and uncomfortable seats, non-functional seat controls and call buttons.
They also alleged that the entertainment screens were inoperative, foul odour inside the aircraft, stinking and unhygienic washrooms.
Bhatnagar also alleged that they were served poor quality food and beverages, and there was a lack of response from the cabin crew despite repeated complaints.
Bhatnagar submitted that these facilities formed an integral part of the service for which a “considerable amount” had been charged.
He placed on record photographs showing the condition of the seats and also relied on a legal notice sent to the airline in November 2023, detailing the grievances.
He alleged that Air India neither responded to the notice nor offered any explanation.
Seeking relief, the complainant asked for a full refund of Rs 3.18 lakh along with Rs 10 lakh as compensation for harassment and mental agony.
Air India denied the allegations, maintaining that the aircraft had undergone routine inspections before departure and was cleared for operation.
The airline claimed that the complainant and his daughter had requested an upgrade to business class, which could not be granted due to non-availability of seats, and suggested that the complaints surfaced only after the request was turned down.
The airline further submitted that the cabin crew had assisted the passengers and offered alternative amenities during the flight.
MakeMyTrip, which was also arrayed as an opposite party, argued that its role was limited to facilitating ticket booking and that it had no control over flight operations or onboard services.
Vineet Upadhyay is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express, where he leads specialized coverage of the Indian judicial system.
Expertise
Specialized Legal Authority: Vineet has spent the better part of his career analyzing the intricacies of the law. His expertise lies in "demystifying" judgments from the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, and District Courts. His reporting covers a vast spectrum of legal issues, including:
Constitutional & Civil Rights: Reporting on landmark rulings regarding privacy, equality, and state accountability.
Criminal Justice & Enforcement: Detailed coverage of high-profile cases involving the Enforcement Directorate (ED), NIA, and POCSO matters.
Consumer Rights & Environmental Law: Authoritative pieces on medical negligence compensation, environmental protection (such as the "living person" status of rivers), and labor rights.
Over a Decade of Professional Experience: Prior to joining The Indian Express, he served as a Principal Correspondent/Legal Reporter for The Times of India and held significant roles at The New Indian Express. His tenure has seen him report from critical legal hubs, including Delhi and Uttarakhand. ... Read More