Premium

15 buffaloes set free: Why Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that moving cattle isn’t always an illegal trip to slaughterhouse

Chhattisgarh High Court on Cattle Transportation Laws: The police was acting on a tip of informer that three to four persons were cruelly beating and driving 15 to 20 buffaloes on foot towards a slaughter house with the intention of slaughtering.

The Chhattisgarh High Court was hearing the plea of cattle owners to release their animals from police custodyThe Chhattisgarh High Court was hearing the plea of cattle owners to release their animals from police custody. (Image generated using AI)

Chhattisgarh High Court Cattle Transport Ruling: Fifteen buffaloes — three females and 12 males — are set to walk free after the Chhattisgarh High Court recently ordered their release from the custody of the local police in the state’s Mahasamund district after they were seized while allegedly being transported to a slaughterhouse.

The unusual case came to light after the three men, claiming to be the owners of the animals, moved the court for their release. The man said they were small-time agriculturists and dairy owners, and the seized buffaloes constituted their sole source of income.

“The mere transportation of agricultural cattle from one place to another for a purpose other than slaughter is not an offence under the said Act,” Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal held.

The court, therefore, directed the district court to handover the buffaloes to their respective owners from the custody of the police.

The animals were seized under Section 6 of the Chhattisgarh Agriculture Cattle Prevention Act, 2004, which provides a prohibition on the transport of agricultural cattle for slaughter.

 

Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Chhattisgarh High Court Justice Jaiswal set aside district court orders that had denied interim custody to owners of 15 seized buffaloes. (Image enhanced using AI)

The law, the court said, was enacted in the interest of the general public and to maintain communal harmony and peace, for the prohibition of the slaughter of agricultural cattle.

“It is also necessary to note that no useful purpose would be served if the said buffaloes are allowed to get custody in the cowshed; rather, the said buffaloes can be released to the petitioners, who claim to be the owners of the cattle, so that they can use them for agriculture,” the court added.

Story continues below this ad

Findings

  • Mere transport of cattle from one place to another for a purpose other than slaughter is not barred under the Act, and in that case, the provision under Section 6(3) of the Act of 2004 would not be applicable.
  • Section 6 of the Act of 2004 provides a prohibition on the transport of agricultural cattle for slaughter.
  • A careful perusal of the district court’s order and other documents annexed with the petition would show that the prosecution or the investigating agency at no place has alleged that the petitioners used to transport the cattle for slaughter in contravention of the provisions of the Act, specifically Section 6(1) of the Act of 2004.
  • The case of the prosecution, in sum and substance, is that the petitioners were carrying the cattle (buffaloes) from Maveshi Bazar Gidhouri, i.e., from one place to another, and it was not in contravention of Section 6(1) of the Act of 2004.
  • In the entire prosecution case, no specific place has been mentioned where the cattle were being transported for slaughter.
  • In the animal health certificate, it has been certified that all 15 cattle (3 female buffaloes and 12 male buffaloes) are in a healthy condition.
  • Therefore, it cannot be said that the agricultural cattle were in bad/injured condition to attract the definition of “slaughter” to apply the bar contained in Section 6(3) of the Act of 2004.
  • There is no objection to their ownership, and they have the right to raise any other grounds and also reserve the right to submit all relevant documents.

Background

  • The matter originated from a police action on September 12, 2025, where authorities seized 15 buffalo based on an informer’s tip that the animals were being driven on foot toward a slaughterhouse.
  • The three petitioners were subsequently charged under Sections 4, 6, and 10 of the Chhattisgarh Agriculture Cattle Prevention Act, 2004.
  • The petitioner’s initial application for interim custody was dismissed by the district courts.
    Following this, the petitioners filed the plea against this order in high court.

Jagriti Rai works with The Indian Express, where she writes from the vital intersection of law, gender, and society. Working on a dedicated legal desk, she focuses on translating complex legal frameworks into relatable narratives, exploring how the judiciary and legislative shifts empower and shape the consciousness of citizens in their daily lives. Expertise Socio-Legal Specialization: Jagriti brings a critical, human-centric perspective to modern social debates. Her work focuses on how legal developments impact gender rights, marginalized communities, and individual liberties. Diverse Editorial Background: With over 4 years of experience in digital and mainstream media, she has developed a versatile reporting style. Her previous tenures at high-traffic platforms like The Lallantop and Dainik Bhaskar provided her with deep insights into the information needs of a diverse Indian audience. Academic Foundations: Post-Graduate in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), India’s premier media training institute. Master of Arts in Ancient History from Banaras Hindu University (BHU), providing her with the historical and cultural context necessary to analyze long-standing social structures and legal evolutions. ... Read More

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement