Allahabad High Court gives major relief to Shiksha Mitrashttps://indianexpress.com/article/jobs/teachers-jobs/allahabad-high-court-gives-major-relief-to-shiksha-mitras-5650602/

Allahabad High Court gives major relief to Shiksha Mitras

The order paves the way for the selection of more 'shiksha mitras' due to a 2017 Supreme Court direction, asking to give them 25 per cent weightage in the next two consecutive selection processes.

Shiksha Mitra, assistant teachers, Shiksha Mitra jobs, teachers protest, Jobs, Indian Express
Shiksha mitras at a protest in Lucknow. (Express Photo by Vishal Srivastav)

In a major relief to thousands of ‘shiksha mitras’ who appeared for the Assistant Teacher Recruitment Exam 2019, the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High court Friday quashed a government notification fixing 65 and 60 per cent as qualifying marks for general and reserved category candidates respectively.

The order paves the way for the selection of more ‘shiksha mitras’ due to a 2017 Supreme Court direction, asking to give them 25 per cent weightage in the next two consecutive selection processes.

Passing the order, the court directed the Examination Regulatory Authority (ERA) secretary to declare the result of the 2019 exam in terms of the Government Order of December 1, 2018 and an advertisement of December 5, 2018.

In the examination last year, the minimum qualifying marks were fixed as 45 and 40 per cent for general and reserved category candidates respectively. Subsequently, the criteria was lowered to 33 and 30 per cent respectively.

Advertising

Allowing dozens of writ petitions by ‘shiksha mitras’, bench of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan directed the authorities concerned to comply with the order soon, preferably within a period of three months.

The court also directed that the entire selection exercise be completed at the earliest after declaring the result, which was stayed by it on February 19 as an interim direction.

“The Government Order of January 7, 2019, is not sustainable in the eyes of law, being arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution as it makes an unreasonable classification (between shiksha mitras and non-shiksha mitras) by giving different treatment to the two groups of identically situated persons appearing in two consecutive examinations,” it said.

The court said there was no valid reason and justification for drastically increasing minimum qualifying marks.

The petitioners had pleaded that fixing the minimum qualifying marks as 65 and 60 per cent after written examination was unwarranted and arbitrary and it could not sustain. Opposing the plea, the state government had submitted that the minimum qualifying marks were fixed to pick out the best candidates for the teaching job.

Besides, 1.40 lakh candidates had appeared in the 2018 examination and this time 4.10 lakh appeared. Considering the high number of candidates, the minimum qualifying marks were fixed, in which nothing was wrong, the state government had contended.