Follow Us:
Friday, May 20, 2022

Supreme Court stays Allahabad HC order imposing lockdown in five UP cities

A day after the High Court's order, the Uttar Pradesh government had moved the Supreme Court against the order.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: April 20, 2021 4:14:49 pm
Uttar Pradesh, UP Covid cases, UP government moves HC, Allahabad HC on lockdown, Yogi adityanath, India news, Indian expressA view of the iconic building of Lucknow, Imambada as ASI protected monuments remained shut for visitors, in view of the rising Covid-19 cases, in Lucknow. (PTI)

The Supreme Court Tuesday put on hold the Allahabad High Court order for a weeklong lockdown until April 26 in five Uttar Pradesh districts, Prayagraj, Lucknow, Varanasi, Kanpur Nagar and Gorakhpur districts, which are reporting a sharp spike in Covid-19 cases.

Refusing to implement the High Court order passed Monday, the Yogi Adityanath-led UP government challenged it in the Supreme Court Tuesday.

The apex court, while pausing the lockdown, asked the UP government to submit within a week before the Allahabad High Court the various steps it has taken to control the pandemic.

During the hearing, the UP government told the bench that the order by Allahabad high court will create immense administrative difficulties and that a lockdown by judicial order may not be the right approach.

Best of Express Premium

DU’s Hindu College professor arrested for post on ‘Shivling&#...Premium
UPSC CSE Key – May 20, 2022: What you need to read todayPremium
On trial MVA govt as BJP, Centre take on each other in courtsPremium
Explained: The Krishna Janmabhoomi case in Mathura, and the challenge to ...Premium

The apex court also appointed senior advocate P S Narasimha as amicus curiae to assist it in future hearings in the UP lockdown case.

On Monday, the High Court passed the order saying that the rising Covid cases had “virtually incapacitated” the medical infrastructure in Uttar Pradesh.

Hearing a PIL on the “inhuman” condition at quarantine centres and the state of Covid treatment, a Division Bench of Justices Ajit Kumar and Siddhartha Varma said that while ordering a lockdown was the government’s prerogative, it was disappointed by the measures taken since its last order, calling them an “eyewash”.

India Covid-19 numbers explained |Why second wave has a higher positivity rate

“Economy, economy and economy is the only tune the government is all the time harping upon. But bread and butter if you take to a person who needs oxygen and medication, it will be of no use to him. You may have grocery shops full of eatables and industries which produce bikes and cars, but all this won’t be of any use if your medical shops run out of stocks of lifesaving drugs… It is a shame that while the government knew of the magnitude of the second wave, it never planned things,” the court had said.

The UP government, however, refused to follow the Allahabad HC order. Additional Chief Secretary (Information) Navneet Sahgal Monday said the government would impose further restrictions, but that apart from saving lives, it had to also think of livelihoods.

In a statement, the government repeated the lives and livelihoods arguments, adding that it had already taken several measures to stop the spread, such as containment zones, night curfews, Sunday bandh, and limits on gatherings. The steps will help stop the spread and it was not thinking about a complete lockdown as of now, the government said.

On April 13, the high court had asked the state government to look into the viability of a complete lockdown in districts where the Covid-19 situation was alarming.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by