Follow Us:
Wednesday, December 01, 2021

Justice Khehar takes charge today: Some of T S Thakur’s comments avoidable, says Ravi Shankar Prasad

The minister said that he was present at the Supreme Court’s Independence Day function at which Thakur “castigated our government on judicial appointments”.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
Updated: January 4, 2017 3:06:35 pm
T S Thakur, T S Thakur farewell, new CJI, CJI farewell, khehar, Ravi Shankar Prasad, J S Khehar, justice J S Khehar, supreme court, National Judicial Appointments Commission, NJAC, indian express news, indian express news, india news Ravi Shankar Prasad. Express Photo

A day before Chief Justice of India T S Thakur is to retire, Union Minister for Law and Justice Ravi Shankar Prasad said here today that some of Thakur’s comments as CJI were avoidable. Prasad also mentioned that despite a “whisper campaign,” there was never any doubt about Justice J S Khehar succeeding Justice Thakur.

Speaking at The Indian Express Idea Exchange transcript will be published in The Sunday Express on January 8 Prasad said that his government has the highest regard for Thakur “but some of the public observations by him were avoidable.”

WATCH VIDEO | Some Of Chief Justice Thakur’s Comments Were Avoidable: Ravi Shankar Prasad

The minister said that he was present at the Supreme Court’s Independence Day function at which Thakur “castigated our government on judicial appointments”. Thakur had expressed his disappointment with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech on Independence Day, saying, “I heard the popular Prime Minister for one and a half hours… I expected some mention about justice also, about appointment of judges.”

Prasad said that it was “unheard of” for the Prime Minister to talk about judicial appointments in such an address. Calling August 15 a “very pious day” he said, “No Prime Minister ever has spoken about judicial appointments from the ramparts of Red Fort.” Prasad said his government did not react then and he wanted to make this observation as he wished Thakur good luck now as he is demitting office.

He was aware of the “whisper campaign”, Prasad said, on rumours about Justice Khehar being superseded. “Let me say it very clearly and categorically,” the Minister said, “the sitting Chief Justice of India recommends the name of his successor. And the day the name came, I sent the file to the Prime Minister and he cleared it.”

There was never any “doubt about Justice Khehar’s elevation”. He said his government was only waiting for the process. He said the judiciary will be “deeply enriched” by him as the new Chief Justice.

Underlining that his government’s “commitment to independence of judiciary is complete and total,” Prasad also discussed the debate around the National Judicial Appointments Commission. He said his government had accepted the 2015 judgment of the Supreme Court that struck it down but sharing what he called were purely his “intellectual observations as a student of the law and the Constitution,” he questioned the verdict’s reasoning.

Prasad said the crux of the Supreme Court’s argument was that as the Law Minister is part of the NJAC, “therefore, if any judge is appointed of that process, then a litigant having a case against the government” may have doubts about the fairness of the procedure.

“And the same (argument was given) about two eminent people,” Prasad said. “If mere presence of the Law Minister creates doubts about impartiality about selection, then the larger question should be raised.” he said.

“The people of the country entrust the prime minister” to take decisions as the principal player in selection of important Constitutional positions like the three service chiefs, the election commissioners, the CVC, CAG, either himself or through his ministers, “but he cannot be trusted to appoint a fair person as a judge,” asked Prasad.

Comparing some of the recent judges from the pre-collegium era, which came into existence in 1993, he wondered if the collegium had “produced judges” of the “same calibre” as some of the older, “legendary” judges.

He later said that if the NJAC “judgment is binding on the government, the judgment is equally binding on the judiciary.” Under the old collegium system “that the Supreme Court (said) is found to be lacking in maybe fairness or other things,” Prasad stated, the government had made 126 appointments. But for the seven vacancies in the Supreme Court, he said, “no names have come to us in the last one year”.

There are 5000 vacancies in the subordinate judiciary in which the government has no role to play, he said.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by