SC reserves Section 377 verdict: ‘If rights are violated, we can’t wait for majoritarian Govts to act’

Section 377 case in SC: The bench indicated that it would only read down Section 377 in so far as consensual acts are concerned with CJI Misra observing that there will be anarchy if it goes away entirely.

Written by Ananthakrishnan G | New Delhi | Updated: July 18, 2018 11:21:10 am
The verdict is likely to come before the tenure of CJI Misra expires, which is ending on October 2. (Express photo by Partha Paul)

Raising hopes among those who have challenged the Indian Penal Code Section 377, which criminalises same-sex relations between two consenting adults in private, the Supreme Court Tuesday observed that it does not wait for “majoritarian governments” to act if it finds that a law violates fundamental rights.

As a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra reserved its verdict on a clutch of petitions challenging the Constitutionality of Section 377, Justice R F Nariman, one of the five judges, told parties opposing the plea that the court cannot do so if the violation of fundamental rights is involved.

“The moment we are convinced that there is a violation of fundamental rights, we cannot leave anything to the legislature… The whole object of the fundamental rights chapter is to strike down laws that violate fundamental rights which majoritarian governments may find difficult to do because of vote bank concerns etc. If the court finds the violation of fundamental rights, we don’t wait for majoritarian governments to act,” Justice Nariman said.

The bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, was replying to advocate Manoj George who, appearing for two Christian organisations, contended that holding the law unconstitutional would have a cascading effect on personal laws of many communities and said “Parliament must deal with it in its legislative wisdom”.

Follow Hearing on validity of Section 377 in SC Highlights

samparan maiti, mr gay world 2018, lgbtq, section 377, Indian Express, Indian Express News Justice Chandrachud did not agree with the view of the counsel that homosexuality was one of the reasons for the spread of HIV. (Express File Photo by Abhinav Saha)

The bench indicated that it would only read down Section 377 in so far as consensual acts are concerned with CJI Misra observing that there will be anarchy if it goes away entirely. “We are only on consensual acts… Consent is the fulcrum… Your enjoyment cannot offend the dignity of others.”

George referred to the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act under which unnatural offence was a ground for divorce. Justice Nariman replied, “yes, an unnatural offence may include other parts of Section 377 such as bestiality”.

Justice Chandrachud did not agree with the view of the counsel that homosexuality was one of the reasons for the spread of HIV. He said it’s the suppression of sexual orientation, and not its recognition, that has contributed to the spread.

“South Africa is the best example,” he said, adding that its President had refused to accept international aid for the HIV-affected saying the country did not have the problem. But the South African Constitutional court reversed that and as a result, South Africa could get the aid, he said. “It’s the suppression that’s the problem… all suppression is,” he said.

Read | What is Section 377 of the IPC?

pride parade photos, Kolkata pride pics, kolkata pride walk 2017 pics, kolkata pride 2017 pictures, kolkata gay parade images, calcutta gay parade pictures, transgender bill, Transgender Day of Rage, calcutta pride walk images, kolkata rainbow walk pics, krpw2017, lgbt, indian express LSenior Advocate K Radhakrishnan, appearing for Trust God Ministries, also said that homosexuality was one of the reasons for the spread of diseases like AIDS. (Express photo by Partha Paul)

Joining issue, Justice Nariman referred to prostitution and said licensing it would help address many health concerns and shoving it under the carpet would fetch no results. “The issue is prohibition in all forms,” he said. George disputed contentions that Section 377 was Victorian era morality. To this, Justice Nariman said, “it’s from Leviticus, from Bible”. George added, “from Leviticus, from Genesis…”.

Senior Advocate K Radhakrishnan, appearing for Trust God Ministries, also said that homosexuality was one of the reasons for the spread of diseases like AIDS. Justice Chandrachud objected to this and said migrant workers also spread HIV. “So going by your logic, all sexual intercourse will have to be banned… even heterosexual,” he said. Justice Indu Malhotra asked advocate Radhakrishnan “sexually transmitted diseases occur among heterosexuals, don’t they?” To this, he replied that “percentage-wise” it was more among homosexuals.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement