scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Monday, May 10, 2021

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre on plea challenging sedition law

The petitioners said they were charged with sedition for questioning the state governments and the Centre, and for comments and cartoons shared on social media platforms.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
Updated: May 1, 2021 4:02:29 am
sedition law, Supreme Court, sedition law unconstitutional, section 124 a, sc plea against sedition law, Indian expressA bench of Justices U U Lalit, Indira Banerjee and K M Joseph sought the Centre’s response on a plea by two journalists

The Supreme Court Friday issued notice to the Centre on a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of Section 124-A of the IPC that penalises sedition.

A bench of Justices U U Lalit, Indira Banerjee and K M Joseph sought the Centre’s response on a plea by two journalists—Kishorechandra Wangkhemcha from Manipur and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla from Chhattisgarh.

The petitioners said they were charged with sedition for questioning the state governments and the Centre, and for comments and cartoons shared on social media platforms. They contended that the provision infringes upon the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Alleging frequent misuse and misapplication of the law since 1962, they said that its “abuse” points to its vagueness and uncertainty, which, in turn, exerts a “chilling effect” on the democratic freedoms of individuals.

The plea said that sections of sedition have been repealed in comparative post-colonial democratic jurisdictions around the world where the offence has been condemned as undemocratic, undesirable and unnecessary.

Referring to the Supreme Court decision upholding its validity in the 1962 case of Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar, the duo said that while the court may have been correct in its finding nearly sixty decades ago, the law no longer passes constitutional muster today.

In February, the top court had rejected a plea urging it to re-examine the constitutional validity of the sedition law.

A bench headed by the then Chief Justice S A Bobde rejected the plea by a group of lawyers pointing out that the Supreme Court had in the past laid down that there should be an appropriate cause of action (materials to sue) to challenge a law, which the petition lacked.

The court said the petitioners were not the affected parties in any case.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
x