Follow Us:
Monday, June 25, 2018

Ex-UGC chief says no particular language stressed upon

The Committee suggested an examination pattern which shall judge a candidate's ability.

Written by PTI | New Delhi | Published: March 15, 2013 12:33:52 pm

Amid criticism of new UPSC rules making English compulsory in civil services exam,a top academician,who headed the panel set up to recommend changes,said it had not emphasised on any particular language but only sought to judge a candidate’s communication ability. 

“The committee suggested an examination pattern which shall judge a candidate’s ability to communicate effectively,be it in any language,” former UGC chairman Arun S Nigavekar said,adding the issue of language was not in the committee’s “terms of reference”. 

He declined to comment on whether the inclusion of English in the civil services mains exam was part of his  committee’s recommendations. 

The committee underlined qualities a 21st century civil  servant should possess to deal with the multi-dimensional  challenges of the present-day world,Nigavekar said. 

“In our recommendations,we gave a broader and generic  outline of the same,” he said. 

Noting that role of a civil servant is becoming more and  more demanding and a prospective bureaucrat will now be  introduced to comparatively more challenging work environment, the committee suggested a pattern where more than knowledge of the candidate,his ability to convert it at the operative  level is tested. 

As per the changes effective from this year,a 100 marks  paper of English comprehension and precis will replace English  and Indian language papers which were qualifying in nature and  their marks were not included while forming the merit list. 

The new pattern has sparked protests with chief ministers  of Madhya Pradesh and Tamil Nadu — Shivraj Singh Chouhan and  J Jayalalitha — expressing dissent over it and seeking Prime  Minister Manmohan Singh’s intervention. 

In Maharashtra,Shiv Sena threatened to disrupt the  Commission’s exams in the state if its demand to include  Marathi in the syllabus was not met. The issue was also raised in Parliament. 

“A civil servant shall not only identify the problems of  his area,he should also be able to effectively communicate  the same to his higher authorities,so that a solution can be 

found,” Nigavekar said over phone from Pune on the panel’s  recommendations. 

When asked whether the new pattern will virtually block  the entry of aspirants who have obtained education in Indian  languages,he said recommendations were made keeping in mind  the existing structure of country’s education and no  “expertise” over any particular subject was stressed upon. 

Noting that English is a global language required for  effective multi-level communication,Nigavekar observed that  some changes become imperative towards working in a global  environment. 

“By no way I am underestimating any regional language. But you know,in the present day scenario,the global  boundaries have disappeared and language has become the unit 

of currency. It is the light and sound of communication,” he said. 

“We cannot shut down our window towards the changes of  the world and at the same time,we should not get thrown  away from our culture. This is what Gandhiji had in his 

vision,” Nigavekar said. 

When told that countries like China and Japan have made  progress without laying stress on English,he said this  phenomenon existed nearly a decade ago and now they too are seeing the language as a tool to deal with global competition. 

“See,these days,you ask students to express themselves  in a concise manner,be it be in any language,most of them  will fail in doing so,” he said. 

The students,however,have protested the new pattern,  claiming that it dents prospects of those who have undergone  education through state education boards,where English is not  much emphasised upon. 

Ranvijay,a journalism post-graduate who left his job to  prepare for the exam,claims the new pattern will shut the  door for Hindi-medium students. 

“Testing English abilities is fine. But why add their  marks in the merit list? Earlier too the English paper was  there,but it was of qualifying nature. Wasn’t it enough to judge the communication skills,” asks Amarendra,a Ph.D researcher at the Jawaharlal Nehru University.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App