This is an archive article published on July 18, 2019
Premium

Reading ICJ verdict: How The Hague rebutted Pak’s key arguments

The Court is of the view that the alleged failure by India to cooperate in the investigation process in Pakistan does not relieve Pakistan of its obligation to grant consular access.

Written by: Apurva Vishwanath
4 min readNew DelhiJul 18, 2019 02:40 AM IST First published on: Jul 18, 2019 at 02:37 AM IST
kulbhushan jadhav, kulbhushan jadhav verdict, kulbhushan death sentence, icj verdict, india pakistan kulbhushan, Hague, ICJ, Kulbhushan news, pakistan icj, international court of justice, indian naval officer case, pak indian spy, indian spy hearing ICJ Judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf delivers the verdict in the Kulbhushan Jadhav case at The Hague on Wednesday. (PTI)

On Jadhav’s nationality

Court observes that the evidence before it shows that both parties have considered Mr Jadhav to be an Indian national. Indeed, Pakistan has so described Mr Jadhav on various occasions, including in its “letter of assistance for criminal investigation against Indian national Kulbhushan Sudhair Jadhev”. Consequently, the Court is satisfied that the evidence before it leaves no room for doubt that Mr Jadhav is of Indian nationality.

Advertisement

READ | After Masood Azhar blacklisting, ICJ verdict in Kulbhushan case isolates Pakistan

On Pakistan’s failure to provide consular access

Pakistan responded to India’s request for consular access for the first time in its note verbale dated 21 March, 2017, in which it stated that “the case for consular access to the Indian national, Kulbushan Jadhev, shall be considered, in the light of Indian side’s response to Pakistan’s request for assistance in investigation process and early dispensation of justice”.

Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor at The Indian Express, where she leads the organizati... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments