Follow Us:
Friday, September 18, 2020

Prashant Bhushant contempt case: SC to pronounce quantum of sentence today

Prashant Bhushan has repeatedly refused to apologise for his tweets, saying they were not done in “absence mindedness” and were nothing but a small attempt to discharge what he considered to be his “highest duty at this juncture in the history of our republic”.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi | Updated: August 31, 2020 12:03:22 pm
Prashant Bhushan, tarun tejpal, tarun tejpal contempt case, supreme court Prashant Bhushan, Attorney General K K Venugopal Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Bhushan (in photo), said that larger questions of law would be dealt with in the matter and assistance of Attorney General was required to be taken.

The Supreme Court will pronounce Monday the quantum of punishment for advocate Prashant Bhushan whom it found guilty of criminal contempt for two of his tweets.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari will deliver the ruling at 10.30 am.

On August 14, the bench had held Bhushan guilty over the tweets made on June 27 and 29. It heard arguments for sentencing on August 20 and reserved its judgement on August 25.

During the arguments, Bhushan submitted a stated to the court that the “two tweets represented” his “bonafide beliefs” and that he did not want to apologise for the same. He also answered in the negative when asked if he wished to reconsider his statement.

The court, however, gave him time till August 24 “to submit unconditional apology, if he so desires”.

Attorney-General K K Venugopal urged the court not to punish Bhushan, saying he had done a lot of good work in the area of public interest litigations.

Bhushan stuck to his guns and, in a supplementary statement on August 24, said the tweets represent his beliefs and apologising for them “would be insincere”.

The bench met again on August 25 to consider the “effect of the supplementary statement”.

Reserving its judgement that day, the bench expressed its anguish at Bhushan’s criticism of “sitting and retired” judges.

The court said while criticism is welcome, one should not “attribute motives to judges” since they cannot go to the press to defend themselves and “can only speak through judgements”.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by