scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Thursday, June 04, 2020

Vizag gas leak: FIR blames ‘some smoke with bad smell,’ names no company staff

The FIR does not mention Styrene despite the fact that police officials had confirmed the presence of this gas by then. The FIR also does not name anyone from the company.

Written by Sreenivas Janyala | Hyderabad | Updated: May 13, 2020 12:14:00 pm
vizag gas leak, Vizag gas leak FIR, Vizag gas leak company, LG poymers, Visakhapatnam gas leak, andhra pradesh gas leak, indian express The NGT also directed LG Polymers India Pvt to submit Rs 50 crore an interim amount for damage to life. (Twitter/Srijana Gumalla)

Eleven persons were killed when Styrene gas leaked from the LG Polymers factory at Visakhapatnam before dawn on May 7. The Andhra Pradesh government set up a high-level probe committee. But the FIR on the gas leak registered at the Gopalapatnam police station by the local police is telling.

Filed at 7 am on May 7, as per police records, almost five hours after the incident, all the FIR states is that “some smoke came out” of the factory, that there was a “bad smell” and it was this smell that endangered life. “At about 0330 hrs some smoke came out from the LG Polymers Company, due to the reason the neighbouring villages (were) affected and getting bad smell and the smell is endanger to human life. Due to fear, all villagers ran…from the houses. In the incident, 5 persons died and the remaining people were admitted in hospitals as in-patients.” Incidentally, the death toll mentioned here is five when 10 had already been confirmed dead by the time the FIR was filed.

The FIR does not mention Styrene despite the fact that police officials had confirmed the presence of this gas by then. The FIR also does not name anyone from the company.

Read | Vizag gas leak: ‘People walked out and just collapsed … women and children were crying’

The FIR was registered under Sections 278 (Making atmosphere noxious to health); 284 (Negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substance), 285 (any act with combustible matter to endanger life), 337 (Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others), 338 (Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others), 304-II (Knowledge that the act had likelihood of causing death) of IPC.

When contacted, Joint Chief Inspector of Factories, Visakhapatnam, J Siva Shankar Reddy, told The Indian Express that the “responsibility of reopening the factory safely” after the lockdown was that of General Manager and Director of Operations, LG Polymers, P P Chandra Mohan Rao.

“But he was not present in the factory on the intervening night of May 6-7 when it was decided to restart operations,” he said.

READ | Vizag gas leak: Angry residents protest outside LG Polymers, demand closure of chemical plant

lg polymers, lg polymers gas leakage, visakhapatnam lg polymers, visakhapatnam lg polymers gas leak, lg polymers visakhapatnam gas leak, lg polymers vizag gas leak, lg polymers gas leakage, lg polymers gas leakage news, lg polymers gas leakage latest news, lg polymers gas leakage today news, visakhapatnam lg polymers gas leakage news A National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) soldier is fitted with gear before he proceeds to the area from where chemical gas leaked in Vishakhapatnam (AP/File)

Despite several calls, Rao was unavailable for comment.

“None of the senior managers was present. There were 24 people in the factory at that time, half of whom were workers on contract. There were a few engineers under whose supervision they were working. They did not have the experience to handle the situation,’’ Reddy said.

Asked why no one was named in the FIR, Visakhapatnam Police Commissioner Rajiv Kumar Meena said: “Even if the FIR does not name anyone, the investigation will find out the role of each person responsible in running the factory. The high-powered committee and the experts committee are also examining the roles of the senior managers.”

Explained: Strict liability rule that NGT wants to apply in Vizag gas leak case

Emails sent to President and Managing Director of LG Polymers, India, Sunkey Jeong and Technical Advisor Dongoso Kim Diaz, elicited no response. Neither of these two officials was present at the factory the night of the incident.
On May 9, LG Polymers broke its silence to issue a statement offering “condolences and apologies to all who have been affected by the incident.”

Admitting that the cause prima facie was the “leaking vapour from Styrene Monomer storage tank,” the company said it was working with the government to ensure that all those affected are “taken care of.” No compensation has been announced by the firm yet.

To probe the incident, the state government constituted a committee headed by Special Chief Secretary (environment and forests) Neerabh Kumar Prasad and four others: Special Chief Secretary (Industries & Commerce Department) R Karikal Valaven; Visakhapatnam District Collector Vinay Chand and Visakhapatnam City Police Commissioner R K Meena as members and AP Pollution Control Board member-secretary Vivek Yadav as member-convenor.

The committee members are taking the help of the directors of Indian Institute of Petroleum at Dehradun and Visakhapatnam, and of NDRF experts on chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear emergencies.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement