Follow Us:
Wednesday, August 17, 2022

Lawyer tells Supreme Court that Babri Masjid was demolished by ‘Hindu Taliban’

The arguement came in response to the Shia Waqf Board submitting that it wished to settle the matter of the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple dispute in Ayodhya amicably.

By: Express Web Desk |
Updated: July 13, 2018 5:58:08 pm
social media hub, whatsapp messeges tapping, Govt whatsapp, Supreme Court, SC on social media hub, Social media, whatsapp msg encryption, whatsapp data, India news The matter is being heard by the chief bench comprising of Chief Justice of Indian Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer on 14 appeals filed against the high court judgment delivered in four civil suits.

The Shia Waqf Board told the Supreme Court on Friday that it wished to settle the matter of the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple dispute in Ayodhya amicably. However, a lawyer for one of the appellants reportedly argued that the board had no locus to speak in the case.

Senior Advocate Rajiv Dhawan, appearing for M Siddiq — an appellant in the suit who has died but is represented through his legal heir — argued that just as the Taliban had destroyed the Buddha statues in Bamiyan in Afghanistan, the ‘Hindu Taliban’ had destroyed the Babri Masjid, reported ANI.

The matter is being heard by the bench comprising of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer. The apex court will continue hearing the matter on July 20.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key-August 17, 2022: Why you should read ‘Remission’ or ‘Free Speech...Premium
BJP shake-up: Gadkari & Shivraj out of Parliamentary Board, Yediyurap...Premium
Crypto romance scams: ‘Asian women’ on Twitter are coming for...Premium
Cheetahs are set to arrive in India, what the big cats have to sayPremium

In its submissions, the Shia Waqf Board said they wished to settle the dispute amicably. The board also stated that the custodian of the Babri mosque was the Shia and the Sunni Waqf Board, and no one else represents India’s Muslims.

On the question of whether the disputed matter should be heard by a Constitution Bench, the Shia Waqf Board submitted that it is ready to relinquish its claim in national interest, and the matter need not be referred to the Constitution Bench.

In May, the Supreme Court heard submissions from Hindu groups that had opposed the plea by Muslim groups seeking that the matter be heard by a larger bench.

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 13-07-2018 at 05:48:13 pm
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by

Featured Stories