Follow Us:
Sunday, May 29, 2022

Coalgate: You don’t need to take instructions from political masters,SC to CBI

Ranjit Sinha had admitted the status report was shared with the law minister as well as PMO.

Written by Express News Service |
April 30, 2013 11:40:20 am

In a big embarrassment to the government in the Coalgate case,the Supreme Court today termed as ‘very disturbing’ the CBI affidavit on sharing its report with the Law Minister and others and slammed the agency for having kept the court in the dark on the issue.

Read Express Editorial: CBI-law minister controversy frames a sobering pattern

Hearing the coal blocks allocation scam case in a packed courtroom,the bench said ‘suppression’ of the fact that CBI has shared its probe report with the government is ‘not ordinary.’

Full Coverage: Coal scam

Best of Express Premium

Why I fell in love with Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Studio despite its sho...Premium
Penalties for delays, cuts in weekly pay: Life gets riskier for 10-minute...Premium
The Sunday Profile: Father, son and ‘holy suits’Premium
Tavleen Singh writes: India must choosePremium

A bench headed by Justice R M Lodha observed that there was a ‘very disturbing feature’ in the affidavit filed on April 26 by CBI Director Ranjit Sinha and the agency must be restored to its independent position.

“On what basis an assertive statement by the CBI,through Additional Solicitor General,was made that status report has not been shared with anyone and it was meant for court alone,” asked the bench.

Sinha,in his two page affidavit filed in the apex court,had said that the agency’s status report on coal allocation scam was ‘shared’ with Law Minister Ashwani Kumar and senior officials of PMO and Coal ministry ‘as desired by them.’

Read Maneesh Chhibber’s column: Will Supreme Court use the opportunity to free it from government shackles?

The apex court said that sharing of information with the government about the probe into the scam has ‘shaken the entire process’ and CBI need not take instructions from ‘political masters’ on their probe.

“Very disturbing feature is there in affidavit. Why was the court kept in the dark about sharing the probe report with government? You don’t need to take instructions from political masters,” the court told the CBI.

“Our first exercise will be to liberate CBI from political interference. CBI’s independent position must be restored,it said.

The Indian Express had first reported on April 13 that the CBI was inclined to inform the Supreme Court that the controversial probe status report had been vetted by the law minister.

In his affidavit,the CBI Director had said,”I submit that the draft of the same (status report) was shared with Law Minister as desired by him prior to its submission before the Supreme Court. Besides the political executive,it was also shared with one joint secretary level officer each of Prime Minister’s Office and Ministry of Coal as desired by them.”

The CBI Director had also assured the apex court that the agency will not share further status reports in this case with any member of the political executive.

Sinha’s affidavit had contradicted the claim made by Additional Solicitor General Haren Raval on behalf of CBI on March 12 that the probe report in the scam has not been shared with any member of the government and it has only been shared with the apex court after being vetted by the CBI director.

The affidavit was filed in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order which,in an unprecedented move on March 12,had directed the CBI director to assure the court that the status report in the coal scam is not being shared with the government.

Today’s hearing came a day after Raval shot off a letter to Attorney General G E Vahanvati in which he alleged that he has been made a ‘scapegoat’ in the matter.

Raval is also believed to have accused Vahanvati of trying to interfere in CBI’s probe report.

Earlier,the CBI and the Centre had clashed over the coalgate. The agency had told the court that there have been ‘arbitrary allotments without scrutiny’ in the coal blocks allocation during the UPA-I tenure.

The government had refuted its findings saying that the ‘CBI is not the final word on this.’

In the status report filed by CBI on March 8,the agency had said that the coal block allocation during 2006-09 was done without verifying the credentials of companies which allegedly misrepresented facts about themselves and no rationale was given by the Coal Ministry in giving coal blocks to them.

(With PTI inputs)

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by