scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Monday, July 04, 2022

Krishna Janmabhoomi case: Mathura court allows plea seeking ownership of Shahi Idgah Mosque land

The dispute essentially involves ownership of 13.37 acres of land which, the petitioners claim belongs to the deity Lord Shri Krishna Virajman.

Written by Apurva Vishwanath | New Delhi |
Updated: May 20, 2022 7:14:57 am
Shahi Idgah Masjid in Mathura. (Photo: Creative Commons)

The district court in Mathura Thursday allowed a plea by the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust and other private parties seeking ownership of the land in which the Shahi Idgah Mosque is built. The Idgah is next to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Sthal, where the deity Krishna is believed to have been born.

The dispute essentially involves ownership of 13.37 acres of land which, the petitioners claim belongs to the deity Lord Shri Krishna Virajman.

The ruling by District and Sessions judge Rajiv Bharti allowing the plea means that the civil suit will now be heard by a lower court. Apart from looking into revenue records, the court will also have to decide the validity of a 1968 ‘compromise agreement’ between Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan, the temple management authority which is a registered society under law and the Trust Masjid Idgah in which the temple authority conceded the contentious portion of land to the Idgah.

Now, private parties and the temple trust allege that the compromise is not valid because the trust holds the land and the temple management authority had no power to enter into a compromise.

Best of Express Premium
Muslims and Judiciary: We do not have Muslim or non-Muslim judges in IndiaPremium
UPSC Key-July 4, 2022: Why to read ‘floating solar plants’ or ‘malnutriti...Premium
DMK MP Raja’s heated pitch on ‘separate Tamil Nadu’, au...Premium
UPSC Essentials: Key terms of the past weekPremium

The Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust was established in 1958.

Lawyers appearing for the Idgah argued that the society is an agent of the Trust and the head of the society is appointed by the Trust itself. The compromise agreement was also subsequently registered.

Last year, Advocate Ranjana Agnihotri along with six others had first filed a claim in the case in the court of a civil judge last year. The civil judge dismissed the plea, holding that it was not maintainable since the none of the petitioners were from Mathura who could have a valid stake in the issue.

Newsletter | Click to get the day’s best explainers in your inbox

The decision was challenged before the district court where the Trust and the temple management authority were made parties the suit.

Sri Krishna Janmasthan Trust claims it was not a party to the compromise agreement and that the society had no right to enter into a compromise on behalf of the land holder — the Trust.

Express Explained Go beyond the news. Understand the headlines with our Explained stories

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement