scorecardresearch
Tuesday, Feb 07, 2023
Advertisement

Jharkhand High Court sets aside ban on PFI

The state government had imposed the ban on PFI on February 21 this year on account of its members being “internally influenced” by ISIS.

Jharkhand High Court sets aside ban on PFI The FIR against Wadud and others as follow-up action to the ban was likely to be quashed as the ground for the FIR — being in possession of material of a banned organisation — has ceased to exist, Wadud’s counsel said.

The Jharkhand High Court Friday set aside a notification issued by the state government on February 21 this year, banning the Popular Front of India (PFI) on account of its members being “internally influenced” by ISIS. The state government had imposed the ban under Section 16 of the Criminal Law Amendment (CLA) Act, 1908.

A single-judge bench of Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay pronounced the order on a petition filed by PFI state general secretary Abdul Wadud. A detailed copy of the order was not yet available.

Wadud and a few others had been named in an FIR — registered at Ranga police station in Sahibganj — as part of follow-up action to the ban. Two more FIRs were registered at Moffusil police station in Pakur and Sahebganj districts after searches at PFI offices on February 25.

After the court order, the petitioner’s counsel Abdul Allam said, “The High Court has set aside the notification of February 21. However, we are waiting for a copy of the order for details.”

Subscriber Only Stories
In this Bengal district, solid, plastic waste management now a people’s m...
Delhi Confidential | GOAT & the gift: PM Narendra Modi gets a Lionel ...
India looks at options to pay defence dues to Russia: stake sale, bonds, ...
Interview with Revenue Secretary | ‘Measures for widening tax base ...

The FIR against Wadud and others as follow-up action to the ban was likely to be quashed as the ground for the FIR — being in possession of material of a banned organisation — has ceased to exist, Wadud’s counsel said.

In his petition, Wadud sought quashing of the notification banning PFI on the ground that Section 16 of the CLA Act, 1908, had earlier been repealed. He also sought quashing of FIR registered against him as it was violative of Article 19 of the Constitution — related to freedom to form association.

In a statement after the ban, the state government said, “The decision to ban this organisation has been taken after taking concurrence of the Law Department… The members of this organisation are internally influenced by ISIS… Investigations have revealed that some members have gone to Syria from the South Indian states and are working for ISIS.”

First published on: 28-08-2018 at 03:13 IST
Next Story

In Goa, Congress leader targets Manohar Parrikar for ‘silence’ on Rafale deal row

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close