Jammu-Kashmir assembly dissolved: Constitutional experts divided over Governor’s movehttps://indianexpress.com/article/india/jammu-kashmir-assembly-dissolved-constitutional-experts-divided-over-governors-move-5458207/

Jammu-Kashmir assembly dissolved: Constitutional experts divided over Governor’s move

Former secretary-general of the Lok Sabha Subhash Kashyap said, "Politics apart, the governor has not done anything which can be called unconstituional.”

J&K alliance LIVE updates: J-K Governor dissolves Assembly after PDP, Lone stake claim
Satya Pal Malik at Raj Bhawan in Srinagar. (Photo: Shuaib Masoodi)

Constitutional experts are divided on the issue of the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly by Governor Satya Pal Malik.
Former secretary-general of the Lok Sabha Subhash Kashyap said: “This (dissolution) is well within his jurisdiction if he is convinced that it is not possible to form a stable government. The Constitution gives him the power to dissolve the assembly and order fresh elections.  After all, he has waited for several months and now there is an attempt to cobble together a government through horse-trading.”
When asked if the Governor’s action could be challenged, Kashyap told The Indian Express: “Well, anybody can go to the court and it is for the court to take a view. However, I don’t think that the Governor can be faulted in this instance. Politics apart, the governor has not done anything which can be called unconstituional.”

However, P D T Achary, another former secretary-general of the Lok Sabha, felt that “the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly by the Governor is clearly aimed at thwarting the formation of a government in the state.”

Explained: Making of an unlikely alliance

He said: “I am not aware of full facts of the matter, but based on the information which is forthcoming at the moment, it is clear that the Governor’s action came in the midst of the efforts by the rival-side to prop up a coalition government.” The BJP was trying to put together another combination to form a government.

“The Governor’s rule”, Achary pointed out, “is a temporary arrangement till a popular government is installed”. “The Governor ought to have explored this possibility. I don’t know why didn’t the governor do it?”

Advertising

As for a court intervention, Achary said, “I am not aware of the grounds cited by the Governor for his action, but it is obviously reflective of his considered view that there is no possibility of a popular government being formed in the state now or later.”