Thursday, Dec 01, 2022

Instant triple talaq invalid, rules Supreme Court in 3:2 verdict

The bench, which read out separate verdicts, ruled 3:2 against the controversial practice, also known as talaq-e-bidat. While CJI Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer upheld the practice of triple talaq, Justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman and U U Lalit held that the practice needs to be abolished. 

Triple Talaq, Triple Talaq verdict, Supreme Court Triple Talaq, Triple Talaq judgment The Supreme Court of India (File Photo)

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a split verdict ruled that the practice of instant triple talaq in the Muslim community is invalid. The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India J S Khehar, set aside the practice by a majority of 3:2.

While CJI Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer upheld the practice of triple talaq, Justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman and U U Lalit held that the practice needs to be abolished.

CJI Khehar ruled that triple talaq enjoys the status of fundamental rights as it is a part of Muslim personal law. He was in favour of putting the practice aside for a period of six months allowing Parliament to legislate on it. CJI Khehar and Justice Nazeer, in their minority verdict, asked political parties to set aside their differences and introduce a new law on the practice, taking into account concerns of Muslim bodies and the Sharia law.

Read LIVE updates here

Subscriber Only Stories
Crisis and anger: Reading China’s ‘Zero-Covid’ and anti...Premium
How to read Q2 GDP dataPremium
Arun Singhal: ‘India will keep importing fertilizers from Russia as long ...Premium
From bonds to banks: Large industry drives credit growthPremium

Meanwhile, Justices Joseph, Nariman and Lalit said that triple talaq must be struck down as it goes against the constitution and is unacceptable. Justice Kurian ruled that triple talaq goes against the tenets of the Quran, and hence violates Shariat law. “It is extremely difficult to agree with the CJI that triple talaq is integral to the practice of Islam,” he said. Justice Nariman and Justice Lalit set it aside, terming it invalid.

In reaction to the verdict, Shayara Bano, the main petitioner said, “I welcome and support the judgment. It is a historic day for Muslim women. In the Muslim community, the condition of women needs to be understood. This judgment needs to be accepted and the law must be made as soon as possible,” reported ANI.

Union Minister for Women and Child Development said, “It is a good judgment and its another step towards gender justice and gender equality.” Read: BJP says SC’s verdict will protect fundamental rights of Muslim women

Former Union Minister Salman Khurshid, who was allowed by the court to assist it as amicus curiae, said, “What we hoped to happen has now happened, it is a good decision.” During the hearing, he had told the Supreme Court that instant triple talaq “cannot be justified or given legal validity”.


Read: Congress welcomes Supreme Court ruling, calls it ‘progressive decision’

The Supreme Court, which began hearing petitions challenging the practice on May 11, had reserved its verdict on May 18, six days after the marathon hearing. Six Muslim women petitioners had argued that it was “unlawful and unconstitutional”. During the hearing, the court had observed that it would examine whether the practice within the Muslim community is an “enforceable” fundamental right to practice religion.

Read the Supreme Court’s verdict on triple talaq here:


SC verdict on triple talaq by The Indian Express on Scribd

(With inputs from agencies)

First published on: 22-08-2017 at 12:17:06 pm
Next Story

Pep Guardiola left frustrated after Manchester City’s missed chances

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments