Follow Us:
Thursday, June 30, 2022

SC slams Madras HC judge’s conduct

The Supreme Court on Wednesday lashed out at Justice C S Karnan and termed his conduct as “indecorous” and “uncharitable”.

New Delhi |
March 6, 2014 1:35:39 am
SUPREMECOURTM A bench led by Justice B S Chauhan said Justice Karnan’s “raw unconventional protest” was despicable.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday came down heavily on Justice C S Karnan, who had stormed a Madras High Court room in January alleging the selection of judges was “not fair” and “irregular”, and termed his conduct as “indecorous” and “uncharitable”. 

A bench led by Justice B S Chauhan said Justice Karnan’s “raw unconventional protest” of walking into a courtroom and making statements when a division bench was hearing a writ petition against the appointments of judges to the High Court “raised a negative murmur about the maintenance of propriety in judicial proceedings.”

The court said: “The sudden unfamiliar incident made us fume inwardly on this raw unconventional protest that was unexpected, uncharitable and ungenerous, and to say the least it was indecorous.”

On Justice Karnan’s complaints of an upper caste bias in appointment of judges, the bench said that he may have “found himself caught in a conflict of class or caste structure and it appears that matured patience might have given way to injure rules of protocol.”

Best of Express Premium
Newsmaker | Eknath Shinde: No. 2 after the Thackerays, backer of BJP, MVA...Premium
UPSC Key-June 30, 2022: Why to read ‘Collective Responsibility’ or ‘Inver...Premium
TN Finance Minister Palanivel Thiaga Rajan: ‘Don’t know of a ...Premium
Efforts to estimate poverty from 2011-21 are commendable, given absence o...Premium

The court observed that such conduct may require a more serious judicial assessment in future. The apex court pointed out that immense dignity was expected from the judges, and that weaknesses or personal notions should not be exposed so as to affect judicial proceedings.

With a “dignified reluctance touching disapproval,” the court refrained from passing any order against Justice Karnan, saying that it was presently concerned with a larger constitutional issue and such matters could be decided at an appropriate time.
Justice Karnan is not new to controversies.

Last June, he had ruled that a couple indulging in “sexual gratification” could be legally considered husband and wife, setting off a furious debate about its implications.

In November 2011, he had created a flutter by alleging that fellow judges had humiliated him. He said dalit judges were targeted and their reputation tarnished whenever they asserted their self-respect. He had claimed that four-five HC judges had humiliated him on the basis of caste.

Justice Karnan, 59, set a precedent at that point in time by addressing a crowded press conference at his chambers in the High Court, where he said he was facing humiliation and embarrassment since April 2009.

He also was the first sitting judge in India to lodge a complaint of caste bias with the National Commission for SC/ST. “Some judges are very narrow-minded; they seek to dominate dalit judges,” Karnan had said.

In January this year, Karnan had sent a complaint to the Commission for Scheduled Castes in New Delhi against former Madras HC Chief Justice R K Agrawal, who has since been elevated to the apex court.

UPSC KEY Have you seen our section dedicated to helping USPC aspirants decode daily news in the context of their exams?

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by