scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Supreme Court stays beef ban in Jammu & Kashmir for 2 months

It asked the high court chief justice to set up the bench at Srinagar and place before it both the matters in which two “conflicting” orders were passed in September.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi |
Updated: October 6, 2015 4:15:45 am
In 2014, India dislodged Brazil from the No. 1 slot, according to the US Department of Agriculture. In its petition, the state had contended that the two conflicting orders have grave ramifications for the law and order since the orders were being misused so as to disturb peace in the state.

Suspending the ban on animal slaughter and sale of beef in Jammu and Kashmir for two months, the Supreme Court Monday asked the Chief Justice of J&K High Court to set up a three-judge bench to examine the legal issues relating to the prohibition and the validity of the law in this regard.

A bench of Chief Justice H L Dattu and Amitava Roy said that in view of the “conflicting” orders by the two high court benches, the chief justice shall constitute a larger bench to examine all contentions.

It asked the high court chief justice to set up the bench at Srinagar and place before it both the matters in which two “conflicting” orders were passed in September.

WATCH VIDEO

Best of Express Premium
How Rampur, Azamgarh were won: Behind BJP chipping away of SP votesPremium
Rationalisation, reforms may test Centre-state relations at GST meetPremium
Clampdown and unclear policy prompt crypto exchange founders to leave IndiaPremium
Explained: What is the 2/3rds rule in anti-defection law?Premium

While the Jammu bench of the HC had ordered enforcement of the ban on sale of beef in the state, the Srinagar bench entertained a PIL against the ban and sought explanations from the state government on the validity of the legal provisions entailing this prohibition.

“This type of matter requires a larger bench. We request the chief justice to constitute such a bench to take a decision on the two petitions,” said the bench, as it also stayed the order imposing the ban.

In its petition, the state had contended that the two conflicting orders have grave ramifications for the law and order since the orders were being misused so as to disturb peace in the state.

 

Express Subscription Do not hit the wall, subscribe for the best coverage out of India starting at just $5 per month

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement