scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Soumya rape case judgement needs to be reviewed, says Markandey Katju

In a Facebook post, he said: "The Supreme Court has grievously erred by law by not holding Govindachamy guilty of murder."

By: PTI | Thiruvananthapuram |
Updated: September 29, 2016 12:23:37 pm
Markandey Katju, soumya rape case, kerala rape, kerala rape case, sowmya rape case, kerala 2011 rpae, rape india, india news Former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju said it was “regrettable” that the court has not read Section 300 carefully. (Source: File)

Former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju on Friday said that the apex court had “grievously erred by law” in the Soumya rape and murder case in which the death sentence of the accused Govindachamy was commuted. In a Facebook post, he said: “The Supreme Court has grievously erred by law by not holding Govindachamy guilty of murder.”

The Supreme Court had on Thursday quashed Govindachamy’s death penalty, but upheld life imprisonment for raping 23-year-old Soumya on February 1, 2011. The death penalty had been imposed by a fast track court in Thrissur, which was later upheld by the Kerala High Court.

WATCH VIDEO:  Markandey Katju Booked For Sedition For Offering Kashmir & Bihar To Pakistan

The apex court had on Thursday found that there was no intention on the part of the accused to kill the victim. It held that since it has not been proved that the accused had intention to kill, he cannot be held guilty of murder.

Best of Express Premium

Explained: LIC’s shares are trading at a discount — but here’...Premium
Explained: What are urban heat islands, and why are they worsening during...Premium
Skyfall in Gujarat, expert says likely debris of a Chinese rocketPremium
Chaos in Kandla after ban: 4,000 wheat trucks in queue, 4 ships half-fullPremium

“What the court has overlooked is that Section 300 IPC, which defines murder, has 4 parts and only the first part requires intention to kill,” Katju said. “If any of the other 3 parts are established, it will be murder even if there was no intention to kill,” the former Press Council Chairman stated.

Katju said it was “regrettable” that the court has not read Section 300 carefully. “The judgement needs to be reviewed in an open court hearing,” he said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement