scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Friday, May 20, 2022

JNU row: Kanhaiya Kumar’s bail plea hearing deferred till Feb 29

The Delhi Police informed the high court they will seek fresh remand of Kumar as two more JNU students have been arrested on sedition charges

Written by Aneesha Mathur | New Delhi |
Updated: February 24, 2016 9:04:30 pm
Kanhaiya Kumar, JNu row, Kanhaiya bail plea, JNU protests, JNU kanhaiya bail plea, Kanhaiya Kumar bail JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday adjourned the bail plea hearing of JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar, arrested on sedition charges, to February 29 after the Delhi Police said they will seek further police remand to interrogate him. The police also submitted a status report opposing Kumar’s bail plea, saying he had “helped organise” the event where alleged anti-national slogans were raised.

Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Delhi Police, informed the bench of Justice Pratibha Rani that the police would move an application seeking Kumar’s police remand for the third time so they can bring him face-to-face with JNU students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, who surrendered on Tuesday night.

Watch Video: What Transpired In Delhi HC Before JNU students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya Surrendered

Allowing the police to move a remand application before the appropriate trial court, the judge observed that she did not want “even one scratch” on “any of them” and that she would be “monitoring” the situation.

Best of Express Premium

DU’s Hindu College professor arrested for post on ‘Shivling&#...Premium
UPSC CSE Key – May 20, 2022: What you need to read todayPremium
On trial MVA govt as BJP, Centre take on each other in courtsPremium
Explained: The Krishna Janmabhoomi case in Mathura, and the challenge to ...Premium

All three students face charges of sedition for raising alleged anti-national slogans on the campus.

READ: Hours after High Court nudge, Umar Khalid, JNU friend surrender to police

Kumar is currently in judicial custody till March 2. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, the police can seek custody for up to 14 days after arrest. For two weeks, judicial custody and police custody can be exchanged. He was previously placed in police custody for three days and then another two days after his arrest on February 12.

READ: Activists demand release of JNU student Kanhaiya

According to police, Kumar’s custody is required to confront him with Khalid and and Bhattacharya and “unearth any larger conspiracy”.

The court deferred the hearing till February 29 after Kumar’s advocates Kapil Sibal and Rebecca John asked to
postpone the hearing as they would oppose the police remand application.

READ: Rohith Vemula, Kanhaiya Kumar: Tale of 2 students, 1 protest

“As a law abiding citizen of the country, I will not obstruct the due process of law,” said John, after the ASG said the police had a statutory right to seek custody during the prescribed time, which would expire on February 27.
“Since two JNU students surrendered last night, we need to confront them with Kanhaiya,” Mehta said.

The judge, in her order issued in the evening, directed the police to inform Kanhaiya lawyers regarding the time and place of filing the custody application.

The bench also directed the Delhi High Court Registrar General to depute a Metropolitan Magistrate to conduct the remand proceedings in a “safe place” for all three students. The court also directed that the time and place of the remand proceedings be kept “confidential” to “avoid any unpleasant incident as well to ensure the safety of the petitioner”.

In the status report opposing Kumar’s bail plea, the police alleged that the “presence and active role of Kanhaiya” had been “established” by the investigation conducted so far. The police also claimed that the “unlawful assembly” of students had raised “anti-national and anti-constitutional” slogans.

Police claimed that Kumar “not only participated” but also “helped organise” the event where alleged anti-national slogans were raised. Giving examples of the slogans raised during the February 12 incident, the report also states that it was “an open secret that the aforesaid conduct of holding an event on February 9 has not only ramification within India, it has an international impact as well”.

Reacting to the status report, John said it was “completely contrary to every available piece of evidence”. “We will be filing a detailed reply to this status report. It is completely illogical and inconsistent with the evidence on record,” said John.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement