Follow Us:
Wednesday, April 21, 2021

Ishrat Jahan encounter case: Here’s what has happened since 2004

Ishrat Jahan, Javed Shaikh, Zeeshan Johar and Amjad Ali Rana are killed in an alleged encounter by officers of Ahmedabad City Crime Branch. Here's a look at what has transpired since 2004.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: June 17, 2016 12:26:55 am
Ishrat Jahan, Ishrat jahan fake encounter, Ishrat Jahan timeline, Ishrat jahan encounter, Ishrat Jahan fake encounter inquiry, Ishrat Jehan fake encounter panel, Home Ministry, Indian Home Ministry, India News Ishrat Jahan

Nineteen-year-old Ishrat Jahan and three others were killed in an alleged fake encounter in Gujarat in 2004. The Gujarat Police had then said those killed were LeT terrorists and had come to Gujarat to assassinate the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

From court cases to probe panels to chargesheets – we take a look at what all has transpired since 2004.

Listen to audio clip of MHA official tutoring witness in Ishrat Jahan case

The Ishrat Jahan timeline:

June 15, 2004: Ishrat Jahan, Javed Shaikh, Zeeshan Johar and Amjad Ali Rana are killed in an alleged encounter by officers of Ahmedabad City Crime Branch. In an FIR, they are identified as LeT fidayeens conspiring to kill then CM Narendra Modi

August, 2004: Ishrat’s mother Shamima Kausar approaches Gujarat HC seeking CBI probe and directions to Union of India to provide compensation

June 8, 2006: Investigating officer Parikshita Gurjar, ACP Mahila Cell, Ahmedabad City Crime Branch files a report before Special Judge, POTA cases, Ahmedabad, concluding that the encounter was genuine and those killed were terrorists. Court orders judicial inquiry by metropolitan magistrate S P Tamang

August 6, 2009: UPA government at the Centre files affidavit in Gujarat HC responding to Kausar’s allegations of a fake encounter. Home Ministry argues against CBI probe. It cites Intelligence Bureau inputs that the four were part of a Lashkar sleeper cell


August 13, 2009: Gujarat HC orders probe by 3-member SIT into whether encounter was genuine or not

September 7, 2009: Report released by Tamang accuses officers of Ahmedabad City Crime Branch of participating in a fake encounter. Gujarat government slams report, accuses Tamang of overstepping jurisdiction

September 9, 2009: Gujarat HC stays Tamang report on a petition filed by state government

September 29, 2009: UPA government files second affidavit in Gujarat HC dropping any references to Ishrat’s alleged terror links and saying that IB inputs were “not conclusive proof” that the four had terror links. Says the government has no objections to a CBI probe

January 28, 2011: SIT member Satish Verma files affidavit in Gujarat HC stating that the encounter was fake


December 1, 2011: Gujarat HC orders registration of fresh FIR in case, transfers probe to CBI

July 3, 2013: CBI files first chargesheet in special court in Ahmedabad naming seven police officers, including in-charge DGP P P Pandey and IPS officers D G Vanzara (retired), G L Singhal and N K Amin. CBI terms encounter “fake”, says it was a joint operation between Gujarat Police and IB

February 6, 2014: CBI files second chargesheet naming IB Special Director Rajendra Kumar, booking him under several IPC sections. Three other IB officers, P Mittal, M K Sinha and Rajiv Wankhede, also charged. While the court took cognizance of the first chargesheet and the case against the seven police officers was committed for trial, hearings in the case have not begun as the court is yet to take cognizance of the second chargesheet filed by the CBI without obtaining sanction for prosecution from the Union government

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by