Wednesday, Sep 28, 2022

In British records, Rahul Gandhi’s nationality has different versions

Subramanian Swamy’s case rests on two annual returns in which Rahul Gandhi’s nationality was described as “British”. The first return was filed on October 10, 2005 and the second on October 31, 2006.

rahul gandhi, rahul gandhi british, rahul british nationality, rahul gandhi nationality, rahul gandhi nationality row, Subramanian Swamy, congress, india news, latest news, top stories Swamy’s case rests on two annual returns in which Gandhi’s nationality was described as “British”. The first return was filed on October 10, 2005 and the second annual return was filed on October 31, 2006. (Source: Express file photo by Prashant Nadkar)

The Congress dismissed BJP leader Subramanian Swamy’s allegation that Rahul Gandhi declared himself a British national to float a firm in that country as false and said that “if somebody has committed an error while uploading, it can be corrected. It is correctable”. The Congress may have to do a lot of correction. British

For, a search through UK’s Companies House records reveals three versions: there are some records relating to Rahul Gandhi’s company, Backops Limited, where he is shown to be a British national; there are some other records of the same company that show him as an Indian national. And there is a third record where he is shown as British but a handwritten change has been made — the word “British” has been scratched out and replaced by “Indian”.

rg3 August 21, 2003

Scrutiny of papers shows that in 2002, Gandhi set up an engineering design outsourcing company called Backops in Mumbai. And a few months later, he opened a related company in the UK. This company, Backops Limited, was registered at the UK Companies House on September 21, 2003. Gandhi was to serve as company’s director and secretary with one other director Ulrik McKnight, a US national.


Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key-September 28, 2022: Why you should read ‘Election Symbols’ or ‘D...Premium
Catching up with the mega fauna in Africa on the translocation of the che...Premium
The last, painful days of Anthony BourdainPremium
Dibang hydel project: Arunachal says no land for national park, NGT drops...Premium

The share allotment record signed by Gandhi shows that out of 100 shares valued at £1 each, Gandhi held 65 shares and McKnight had 35.

rg Identified as British in two returns: October 10, 2005 and October 31, 2006.

Swamy’s case rests on two annual returns in which Gandhi’s nationality was described as “British”. The first return was filed on October 10, 2005 and the second annual return was filed on October 31, 2006. Both these documents identify Gandhi as a “British” national.

In the first return, Gandhi’s address is given as 2 Frognal Way, London NW3 6XE, a plush London neighbourhood close to Hampstead. Then Gandhi filed another document changing his address to 51 Southgate Street, Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 9EH, which is also the address of his co-director McKnight.

Watch video

In 2004, the company’s turnover was £65,380, showing a net profit of £6,034. In the year 2005, it had a turnover of £38,462 and a net profit of £8,066. In 2006, the company submitted abbreviated accounts because being a small company, it was allowed not to file detailed profit and loss statement.


However, in the original Certificate of Incorporation, dated August 21, 2003, his nationality is shown as Indian. This document was electronically filed by Gandhi’s agent Damian Wardingly of Bourse Company Services, Bristol.

rg-2 October 8, 2004

There is another scanned and hand-filled document, which is signed and amended by Gandhi’s co-director McKnight. In this document, originally filed in July 2004, Gandhi’s nationality is typed as British. It is then hand-amended by McKnight to “Indian,” on October 8, 2004.

The Companies House was not available to comment on the discrepancies found in the records of a company that was dissolved in 2009. “Hiding details about the nationality of directors is a fraudulent activity, most probably punishable by a fine”, said Raj Ruparelia, Principal at Bassetts Chartered Accountants. “Though there are no obvious tax advantages either for the British or Indian company directors. Perhaps some prospective investors and shareholders might be more inclined to invest in a company that is owned by the British directors. But there is evidence here that one of the directors was aware of this discrepancy and was trying to amend it,” he said.


Company formation in the UK is very quick now. All information, including director’s details, are filed electronically and documents could be downloaded within minutes. You do not need to sign any documents manually. Sometimes, as in this case, the registration is done through an agent. Most companies also file their returns through their accountants. “Ideally a client should thoroughly check all the documents filed on their behalf, but my experience suggests in many cases this doesn’t happen”, says Ruparelia.

Click here to read Hindi version of the article

First published on: 19-11-2015 at 02:10:05 am
Next Story

EoW probes case against logistics firm for ‘fraud’

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments