- India vs England 3rd Test Day 4 Live Cricket Score Streaming, Ind vs Eng Live Score: India need four wickets to win
- Kerala floods LIVE: All affected tracks restored, says Indian Railway; normal rail traffic to begin from today
- Asian Games 2018 Day 3 Highlights: India add five medals to tally with one gold
A highly disappointed civil rights activist Teesta Setalvad on Friday dubbed the verdict in the Gulberg Society massacre case as a ‘diluted and weak’ judgment while stating that she would appeal against the same.
“11 people had to be given life imprisonment since they were convicted in serious offences, but the biggest disappointment for us that rest of them including those 12 people, who have been given seven years of imprisonment,” Setalvad told reporters.
- Gulberg massacre case: BJP, Congress spar over verdict
- Gulberg massacre sentencing: Why it isn’t as harsh as Naroda Patiya
- Gulberg Massacre Verdict: BJP, Cong blame each other for politicising issue
- Gulberg Society verdict: This is not justice, my struggle continues, says Zakia Jafri
- Gulberg massacre verdict: Who said what
- Gulberg Society massacre: Court sentences 11 persons convicted of murder to life in prison
“We believe, when a person is convicted under Section 436 and 149 then there should have been a life imprisonment under these also. And in that sense, it is very much diluted judgement and a weak judgement to which we will surely be appealing,” she added.
She further said that they had asked for compensation for the survivors under Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
“We don’t know how the judge has dealt with it,” she added.
On Friday, a special SIT court awarded life imprisonment to 11 persons convicted for murder, 12 were given seven years imprisonment and one was given 10 years jail in connection with the Gulberg Society massacre case.