scorecardresearch
Friday, Dec 02, 2022

If Ayodhya verdict is in Muslims’ favour, then construction of mosque should be delayed: Litigants

The apex court on Wednesday wrapped up the 40-day hearing in the decades-old temple-mosque dispute in Ayodhya -- the second longest proceedings in its history -- and reserved its verdict in the politically sensitive case that is expected in a month's time.

ayodhya case, ayodhya dispute, Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, sc ayodhya case, ayodhya case muslim litigants, ayodhya mosque Mohammad Umar, who is also a litigant in the case, said he agreed with postponing the construction. (Express file photo)

Some Muslim litigants in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute have said that if the Supreme Court’s verdict is in their favour then the construction of mosque should be delayed on the disputed land in Ayodhya to maintain harmony. A litigant, Haji Mahboob, said that keeping in view the condition of the country, the first priority is to maintain harmony.

“If the verdict is in favour of Muslims, then in the greater interest of peace and communal harmony, we should not build a mosque on the land, we should construct a boundary around it and leave it,” he said. “This is my personal opinion, what I think should be kept in view is the present situation of the country. I will also discuss this proposal with other litigants,” he said.

Another litigant, Mufti Hasbullah Baadshah Khan, who is the local president of the Jamiat Ulema Hind, also agreed with Mahboob. “It is correct that we must take care of communal harmony first. We will discuss the situation with senior Muslim religious leaders. In the current scenario we should postpone the mosque’s construction, if the verdict comes in our favour,” he said.

Mohammad Umar, who is also a litigant in the case, said he agreed with postponing the construction. “We must take care of peace and communal harmony in the society,” he added. Iqbal Ansari, one of the main Muslim litigants did not comment on the remarks, but said that they will not allow any breach in the communal fabric of the society. “Let the verdict be pronounced,” he said.

Subscriber Only Stories
IITs to bring back Class 12 performance criterion for admissionsPremium
UPSC Key- December 2, 2022: Why you should read ‘UN Security Council’ or ...Premium
Poet, playwright and linguist…how Savarkar impacted MarathiPremium
Wanted: New York City rat czar. Will offer salary as high as $170,000Premium

The apex court on Wednesday wrapped up the 40-day hearing in the decades-old temple-mosque dispute in Ayodhya — the second longest proceedings in its history — and reserved its verdict in the politically sensitive case that is expected in a month’s time.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

On December 6, 1992, the Babri Masjid, constructed at the disputed site in the 16th century by Shia Muslim Mir Baqi, was demolished.

First published on: 19-10-2019 at 10:22:25 pm
Next Story

Tamil Nadu bypolls: Campaigning for Nanguneri and Vikravandi ends

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close