Updated: July 9, 2020 11:02:28 am
*Top officials of LG Polymers claimed they promptly reached the accident site but CCTV footage showed they arrived more than two hours later.
* The surge in polymer content that set off the leak on May 7 at 2.42 am had also happened barely 10 days earlier but no serious note was taken.
*There was no onsite and offsite emergency plan, the management didn’t alert the local residents and washed its hands of the tragedy, leaving the clean-up to the administration.
*Cost-cutting hurt talent; some staff classified as “engineers or senior engineers” were merely Class XII graduates.
The committee is headed by Special Chief Secretary (Environment, Forests, S&T), Neerabh Kumar Prasad.
The leak began at 2:42 am, and as per the committee’s report, Director of Operations P P C Mohan Rao claimed that he had reached the factory at 3:55 am; General Manager (Production) G Raju claimed he arrived at 4:40 am; Safety Head claimed he reached the spot first at 3:23 am, while GM (Maintenance) claimed that he arrived at 3:56 am.
However, the committee said that it verified with police and personnel of various relief and rescue agencies and checked CCTV footage to find that none of the top LG officials arrived before 5 am. “…This needs further investigation,’’ the report said.
The report also notes that factory data from April 25 and April 28 indicated a spike in polymer content in Styrene. On May 7, the same process led to the leak. Similar spikes, the probe said, were noticed as early as April 4 but these were “totally ignored.”
The report said that LG Polymers had no effective onsite emergency plan or a strategy to tackle a Styrene vapour release.
“LG Polymers did not take part in any of the rescue or evacuation activities; rather, passed the entire responsibility to the district administration and the local community. LG Polymers failed to alert residents in the neighbourhoods by activating the siren, although the siren was in a working condition and had multiple activation points, including near the factory gate. This was a fatal lapse,’’ said the committee.
The probe committee red-flagged the “inadequate qualifications” of some staff who were assigned the maintenance of the Styrene tanks and the refrigeration process.
“(Graduates) of ITI and Diplomas were designated as engineers and given high posts. The Technical Committee reported that even some Intermediate-pass staff were designated as ‘Senior Engineer.’ The responsibility for the absence of competent and qualified employees lies squarely with the management,’’ the report said.
Despite multiple requests, LG Polymers did not provide any documentation showing standard practices for storage of Styrene at LG’s facilities outside India. This raises the concern that less stringent standards may have been applied to the Indian facility, leading eventually to the disaster, the report said.
On Wednesday, the 12 executives of LG Polymers, who were arrested July 7 were produced before a magistrate who remanded them to 15 days in judicial custody.
They include: Managing Director and CEO Sunkey Jeong; Technical Director D S Kim; Additional Director (operations) P P C Mohan Rao; in-charge,Styrene monitoring. K Srinivas Kiran Kumar; and production team leader Raju Satyanarayana.
A spokesperson for LG Polymers was unavailable for comment but on May 12, in its first communication after the leak, it had said that it apologised to the affected families, it would co-operate with the probe and bear medical expenses of those affected.
📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines