scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Sunday, November 28, 2021

Former Lt Col Prasad Purohit accuses ATS of fabricating evidence against him: Bombay HC

Purohit's lawyer Shirkanth Shivade on Wednesday alleged that the ATS had planted false and fabricated evidence against his client and this was clearly evident from the charge sheet filed by NIA.

By: PTI | Mumbai |
January 11, 2017 6:08:35 pm
Prasad Purohit, Prasad Purohit- Malegaon blasts, Malegaon blasts, Prasad Purohit-ATS, Purohit slams ATS, Bombay High Court, indian express news Ex-Lt Col Prasad Purohit (File Photo)

Former Lt Col Prasad Purohit, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blasts case on Wednesday alleged before Bombay High Court that Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad had fabricated evidence against him and even the National Investigation Team (NIA) disagreed with the ATS probe. A division bench of Justices R V More and Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing an appeal filed by Purohit against a sessions court order rejecting his bail application.

Watch what else is making news:

Purohit was arrested on November 5, 2008 for his alleged involvement in the conspiracy that was hatched by right wing groups between January and September 2008 to carry out blasts in the Muslim-dominated Malegaon city. While the probe was handled by ATS, it was later transferred to the NIA which dropped the stringent provisions of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) from the case and also gave a clean chit to some of the accused, including prime accused Sadhvi Pragya Singh.

Purohit’s lawyer Shirkanth Shivade on Wednesday alleged that the ATS had planted false and fabricated evidence against his client and this was clearly evident from the charge sheet filed by NIA. “Purohit was taken in custody from the Indian Army on October 29, 2008. He was illegally detained and tortured by ATS. On November 3, 2008, ATS officers planted RDX in a room and claimed Purohit had revealed about this room during interrogation,” Shivade alleged.

He claimed that several witnesses, when questioned by NIA, had said that the ATS had coerced them into giving false statements. “Now there are two contradictory statements of the same witnesses, one to the ATS and the other to NIA. All this will be seen at the time of trial. But now Purohit’s custody is not required,” Shivade said.

“The ATS is infamously known for framing innocent persons and planting evidence against accused. In the same case, the CBI has filed FIR against few ATS officers for their involvement in the missing of a witness (Dilip Patidar),” Shivade said. The HC will continue hearing the arguments on Thursday.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement