Premium
This is an archive article published on August 12, 2020

Consider demand to reopen Jain temples during Paryushan festival, HC tells Maharashtra govt

The petitions sought a direction to the state government to allow the members of the community to visit Jain temples to perform prayers, more particularly during the period of Paryushan from August 15 to 23.

The Bombay High Court (file)The Bombay High Court (file)

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday directed the Maharashtra government to consider representations by the Jain community seeking permission to enter Jain temples during the eight-day Paryushan festival and submit its decision to the court by August 13.

A division bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Madhav Jamdar was hearing two petitions, filed by Ankit Vora and Shree Trustee Atma Kamal Labdhisurishwarji Jain Gyanmandir Trust. The petitions sought a direction to the state government to allow the members of the community to visit Jain temples to perform prayers, more particularly during the period of Paryushan from August 15 to 23.

The petitioners stated that if the malls and market places, barber shops, spas, saloons, beauty parlours, liquor shops can be operated within restrictions, then why can’t similar social distancing principles be set up for the community who wishes to offer prayers at the temple. The petitioners through their advocates Prakash Shah, Jas Sanghvi and Prafulla Shah claimed that not allowing the opening of religious places is “arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable”.

The petitioners further stated that members of the Jain community had no objection if any restrictions were placed as to the number of persons entering the temple at particular time, and the community members would abide by all conditions which the state may want to follow. The petitioners said that representation made to the state government availed no response.

Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh said that the Centre had permitted the opening of places of worship outside Covid-19 containment zones and had issued separate guidelines for such places. The state government should decide the issue, he further said.

The court directed the petitioners to submit the representations to the Secretary, Disaster Management Department of the Maharashtra government. After hearing submissions, the bench led by Justice Kathawalla directed the state government to consider the representation made by the petitioners and submit its decision before the court on Thursday.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments