scorecardresearch
Sunday, Oct 02, 2022
Premium

CBI to court: NSA, Rakesh Asthana’s phones not tapped under Alok Verma

The affidavit, filed through special public prosecutor Rajdipa Behura, was in reply to a public interest litigation (PIL) by Sarthak Chaturvedi, an advocate, who has sought a probe by a special investigation team into alleged phone tapping of NSA Doval.

CBI, NSA, Rakesh Asthana, Rakesh Asthana phones call tapped, Alok Verma, CBI vs CBI, the telegraph act, agencies intercept phonecalls, calls intercepted, india Telephonic interceptions, indian express The petitioner has also sought an investigation into charges of abuse of power by some CBI officials by illegally tapping phone calls.

The CBI on Tuesday informed the Delhi High Court that at no point of time during the tenure of its former director Alok Verma were telephone calls of National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and the agency’s former special director, Rakesh Asthana, “intercepted” by its Special Unit.

“It is also submitted that the CBI never put any telephone number under surveillance illegally. The veiled reference of the petitioner to illegal interception of phone numbers of the then Law Secretary and other IAS offices is vehemently denied,” the agency stated in its affidavit filed before a bench headed by Delhi HC Chief Justice Rajendra Menon.

The affidavit, filed through special public prosecutor Rajdipa Behura, was in reply to a public interest litigation (PIL) by Sarthak Chaturvedi, an advocate, who has sought a probe by a special investigation team into alleged phone tapping of NSA Doval. The petitioner has also sought an investigation into charges of abuse of power by some CBI officials by illegally tapping phone calls.

Chaturvedi has petitioned the court to direct the Central government to frame comprehensive guidelines regarding tracing, tapping and surveillance of phone calls.

Subscriber Only Stories
From The Explained editor: The ban on PFI, forests at night, and free gra...Premium
From the Opinion Editor: An election for the Congress partyPremium
From Nehru to JP, the political leaders mentored by GandhiPremium
Uttarakhand resort murder: Amid questions within, BJP may revamp Dhami go...Premium

In reply, the agency submitted that “interception of phone calls and technical surveillance are undertaken in CBI after following established procedure as per law”.

Hence, the affidavit stated, allegations of abuse of power is denied as being “false, incorrect and baseless”.

Apprising the court that the Centre already has guidelines in place, the affidavit stated that technical surveillance by the CBI has been carried out in a “proper manner”, and that competent authorities from where authorisation is obtained is informed regularly about the outcome of such technical surveillance.

Advertisement

Seeking dismissal of the PIL, the CBI maintained that phones of accused persons, against whom the agency had registered corruption cases in October 2018, were “lawfully put under surveillance as per authorisation obtained from competent authority” under the law.

The affidavit pointed out that that the Indian Telegraph Act clearly defines cases in which interception of phone calls is permitted by the Central government, and thus an individual’s fundamental rights are not infringed.

The Union Home Ministry has already submitted before the court that telephone interceptions by law enforcement agencies are carried out in the “interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India”.

First published on: 27-03-2019 at 04:43:00 am
Next Story

111 Tamil Nadu farmers to contest against Modi: BJP leaders promise to add their demands in manifesto

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement