Follow Us:
Sunday, May 22, 2022

Ayodhya hearing: Conclude arguments by October 18, there won’t be an extra day, says SC

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, who is heading the bench, said it will be miraculous if the top court can write judgment in the remaining time given the amount of materials parties have given."

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
September 26, 2019 12:30:32 pm
Ayodhya hearing, Ayodhya hearing last date, Supreme court on Ayodhya, Babri masjid case, Ram temple-babri masjid dispute, india news, indian express The Supreme Court said that there will be no extra day of the hearing.

The Supreme Court Thursday asked parties in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case to complete their arguments by October 18, adding that they won’t be given an extra day. Today is the 32nd day of hearing in the case.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, who is heading a five-judge bench, said, “If arguments can’t get over by October 18, there won’t be an extra day.” The bench also comprises Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, and S Abdul Nazeer.

Gogoi also pointed out that the bench will only have four weeks to write and deliver the judgment once arguments conclude. “It will be miraculous if the top court can write judgment in the remaining time given the amount of materials parties have given,” he said.

In response, the parties said they will try to abide by the timeline.

Best of Express Premium

FY22: As Covid curbs ease, outward remittances up 55% to all-time highPremium
A letter from Mathura: ‘Radha ki chunari bhi Salma silti hai’Premium
A Letter From Varanasi: ‘It’s our waqt… Ayodhya will happen in Kash...Premium
Tavleen Singh writes: Evil under the sunPremium

On Wednesday, senior advocate Meenakshi Arora, appearing for the Muslim parties, had questioned the authorship of the Archeological Survey of India’s (ASI) report — the ASI had excavated the disputed site on Allahabad High Court’s orders. To this, the bench had said the mosque side should have questioned this during the trial, and not now during appeal.

Arora also disputed the ASI findings on pillar bases and other evidence recovered after digging the site, which the court again said should have been put to the experts during trial.

However, Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who is also representing the Muslim parties, today said, “Yesterday’s argument was futile. Authorship can’t be questioned. Authenticity not in doubt.”

A day after conceding that the Ram Chabutra located on outer yard of the disputed site in Ayodhya was the birthplace of Ram, the Sunni Central Wakf Board on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that it had not made any such acceptance, but merely said it had not questioned a Faizabad court’s 1886 finding that Hindus worshipped the Chabutra under the belief that it was Ram’s birthplace.

“What I said was not our acceptance…. Since the Faizabad judge said so, we have not taken any steps for eviction,” senior advocate Zafaryab Jilani, appearing for the Sunni Board, told a five-judge Constitution bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi hearing the Ayodhya dispute case.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by