Amid Opposition uproar, Lok Sabha nod to RTI amendment Billhttps://indianexpress.com/article/india/amid-opposition-uproar-lok-sabha-nod-to-rti-amendment-bill-5842891/

Amid Opposition uproar, Lok Sabha nod to RTI amendment Bill

The Opposition attack was led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who called the Bill an “elimination Bill”.

  RTI Act amendments, rti bill, right to information amendment bill, right to information act, rti act explained, parliament monsoon session, rti amendment bill 2019, rti amendment bill passed, nhrc bill, parliament today, lok sabha, rajya sabha
Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Parliament on Monday. (Express photo by Renuka Puri)

Amid loud protests from the Opposition, claiming that the government was trying to “dilute”and “eliminate” the Right To Information (RTI) Act, the Lok Sabha, where the BJP has a brute majority, cleared the changes to the landmark transparency law on Monday.

Terming the BJP-led NDA government’s move to amend the RTI Act to give the Centre the power to fix salaries, tenure, terms and conditions of the role of Information Commissioners (ICs), as “an insult to Parliament, Constitution and judiciary”, the Opposition called for a vote on the The Right to Information (Amendment) Bill, 2019. The Bill was passed with 218 votes in its favour and 79 against.

Explained | What has changed in RTI Act? Why are Opposition parties protesting?

During the debate on the Bill, Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh rejected the Opposition’s charges, saying the amendment Bill was an enabling one and that the autonomy of ICs would not be impacted. He added that the Bill aimed at institutionalisation, streamlining and ease of delivery of the RTI Act.

Advertising

The Opposition attack was led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who called the Bill an “elimination Bill”. Claiming that the government was trying to dilute the “pathbreaking” Act, passed during the Congress-led UPA regime, Tharoor said the NDA government is trying to change it without “public consultation”or a scrutiny by parliamentary standing committees. “Why is the government desperate to rush through the Bill? Is it because the Central Information Commission (CIC) delivered an order on the Prime Minister’s educational details,” Tharoor asked. He demanded that the Bill be sent to a standing committee for further study.

READ | Activists slam Centre’s move on RTI (Amendment) Bill 2019, say will make law another ‘toothless tiger’

The BJP’s Jagadambika Pal said the Opposition was trying to mislead people.

DMK’s A Raja alleged that the NDA government was trying to use its “numerical strength to dictate Constitutional values”. Countering the government’s argument that the post of the CIC could not be compared to the Election Commission, Raja said the EC directly draws its powers from Article 324 whereas the RTI derives from Article 19, which is a fundamental right and cannot be changed. “Without election, democracy can still function with an administrator, but without information, citizens cannot be empowered,” he said.

READ | Lok Sabha passes RTI (Amendment) Bill; will make panel ‘toothless tiger’, says Opposition

Terming the move to amend the Act as a “retrograde step”, Trinamool Congress MP Saugata Roy contended that independence and autonomy were keywords for the RTI but with the changes to the Act, they have been taken away. “Government does not like free information,” Roy said.

Danish Ali of the Janata Dal (Secular) accused the Centre of “bulldozing” national institutions. “In a few days, they will bring a law to ban speech also. You want to bulldoze every institution,” he alleged.

N K Premachandran of the RSP also came down heavily on the government. He opposed the Bill on three grounds. “First, it is an insult to the Constitution of India because the independent and autonomous character of the Information Authority is being taken away. It is an insult to the Parliament of India because the legislative supremacy of the Parliament is being taken away by the Executive. I will elucidate this point afterwards. Thirdly, this violates the judgments of the Supreme Court. There are a series of judgments on this. That means, it is an insult to the judiciary; it is an insult to the Parliament and above all, it is an insult to the Constitution of India. That is why I am saying that this is the blackest day in the legislative history of the Indian Parliament,” he said.