Follow Us:
Monday, August 15, 2022

Allahabad HC says previous orders on interfaith marriages not ‘good law’

This assumes significance as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had cited this order while announcing he would bring a law on 'love jihad'.

Written by Asad Rehman | Lucknow |
Updated: November 25, 2020 10:15:38 am
UP: Family ‘abducts’ girl who had eloped, police rescue herThe Allahabad High Court said to disregard the choice of a person, who is an adult, will "not only be antithetic to the freedom of choice of a grown up individual but would also be a threat to the concept of unity in diversity". (File)

Quashing an FIR that accused a Muslim man of abducting a Hindu woman and forcefully marrying her after converting her to Islam, the Allahabad High Court has said that “two adults are free to choose their partner” and that it is their right to freedom of choice as to whom they would like to live with.

The Bench of Justice Pankaj Naqvi and Justice Vivek Agarwal also said that the High Court’s judgments in two previous cases of interfaith marriages where it had observed that “conversion just for the purpose of marriage is unacceptable” were “not good law”.

The order assumes significance as Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had cited one of the same High Court judgments to bring a law against ‘love jihad’.

“None of these judgments dealt with the issue of life and liberty of two matured individuals in choosing a partner or their right to freedom of choice as to with whom they would like to live. We hold the judgments in Noor Jahan and Priyanshi as not laying good law,” the court said, referring to the previous orders of the High Court in two interfaith couple cases.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Essentials: Key terms of the past week with MCQsPremium
ExplainSpeaking | India at 75: 11 charts to understand how far India has ...Premium
Why a majority of Muslims opposed Jinnah’s idea of Partition and stayed o...Premium
Delhi Confidential: Who will hoist the Tricolour at the AICC headquarters...Premium

Also Read | SIT probe into ‘love jihad’ rules out conspiracy angle, outside funding

The court, however, added, “We clarify that while deciding this petition, we have not commented upon the validity of alleged marriage/conversion.”

The court made the observations on November 11 while hearing a petition filed by Salamat Ansari and Priyanka Kharwar (Alia), which sought quashing of the FIR filed by the woman’s father. The couple, who had got married in August last year after Kharwar converted to Islam, said in their petition that the FIR was “prompted by malice and mischief”.


The FIR, lodged in Kushinagar district, had booked Ansari, his mother and brother for kidnapping, inducing a woman to compel her to marriage, assault and criminal intimidation. Police had also invoked sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act against Ansari.

“We do not see Priyanka Kharwar and Salamat as Hindu and Muslim, rather as two grown-up individuals who out of their own free will and choice are living together peacefully and happily over a year. The courts and the Constitutional courts in particular are enjoined to uphold the life and liberty of an individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Right to live with a person of his/her choice irrespective of religion professed by them is intrinsic to right to life and personal liberty. Interference in a personal relationship would constitute a serious encroachment into the right to freedom of choice of the two individuals,” the High Court said in its order.

The court said that to disregard the choice of a person who is an adult will “not only be antithetic to the freedom of choice of a grown-up individual but would also be a threat to the concept of unity in diversity”.


“…we are quashing the FIR primarily on the ground that no offences are made out…. as also the fact that two grown-up individuals are before us, living together for over a year of their own free will and choice,” the court said.

It also referred to the Supreme Court’s 2018 order setting aside the Kerala High Court judgment annulling the marriage of Muslim convert girl Hadiya and Shefin Jahan. The Supreme Court had then said that “the right to marry a person of one’s choice is integral to Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution”.

“A perusal of the aforesaid judgment manifests that the Supreme Court has consistently respected the liberty of an individual who has attained the age of majority,” the Allahabad High Court said.

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 24-11-2020 at 02:56:38 pm
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by

Featured Stories