scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Friday, July 10, 2020

Allahabad HC drops SC/ST Act charge against Aligarh man convicted of raping minor

Additional Advocate Rupak Chaubey, one of the government counsel, said they will challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court.

Written by Asad Rehman | Lucknow | Published: June 11, 2020 2:16:35 am
Allahabad High Court. SC/ST Act charge in Aligarh rape case, Aligarh minor rape In 2009, the man was sentenced to life imprisonment and was convicted under IPC section 376 (rape) and the SC/ST Act by a trial court.

The Allahabad High Court has commuted the life sentence of an Aligarh resident convicted of raping an eight-year-old girl in 2005 and dropped charges under the SC/ST Act against him. It also ordered that the convict may be released after being in jail for more than 12 years.

In a judgment passed on June 5, a bench comprising Justice Pankaj Naqvi and Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery said, “(T)he conviction/sentence under Section 376 IPC r/w Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act is altered to conviction under Section 376 IPC only on sentence undergone while acquitting the appellant under Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act. The appellant is in jail. He shall be released forthwith….”

Additional Advocate Rupak Chaubey, one of the government counsel, said they will challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court.

The incident occurred on January 16, 2005, when the girl was raped by the man after he lured her with Rs 20 to a vacant house in the neighborhood where she lived. In 2009, the man was sentenced to life imprisonment and was convicted under IPC section 376 (rape) and the SC/ST Act by a trial court.

The lawyer representing the convict argued in the High Court that there was no evidence to substantiate charge under the SC/ST Act as his client did not know that the victim belonged to the Scheduled Caste community. He also said the convict had been in jail since February 6, 2008 and if conviction was upheld, then the sentence should be reduced to the jail term undergone.

One of the government counsels argued that it was “highly probable” that the convict knew the girl belonged to Scheduled Caste as he was a resident of a nearby neighbourhood.

The HC observed, “Prosecution has not brought any evidence on record which could even suggest that the accused committed offence of rape, only for the reason that the victim was a member of Schedule Caste or Schedule Tribe as he had no prior acquaintance with the victim.”

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App.

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement